Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_3300-043P2750.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
George Washington Memorial Parkway: PRA-GWMP BMS MD(1), VA(1)
Solicitation number
DTFH71-13-B-00003
Issued by

About this file

Bridge Inspection Rpt_3300-043P2750

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

ABANDONED QUARRY BRIDGE

GWMP (SB) OVER ABANDONED QUARRY

GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 4/15/11

Federal Highway Administration

Report prepared by: ES

MILE POINT:

KILOMETER POINT:

7.89 12.70

Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

ABANDONED QUARRY BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/15/11

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SILL

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1A61 / 195

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 7 - URBAN PARKWAY

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2010-ROADWAY REPAVED.

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

102.5 FT (31.2 M)

98.5 FT (30.0 M)

45.0 FT (13.7 M)

42.5 FT (13.0 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 7.89 (KM PT 12.70)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 0.1 MILES SOUTH OF SPOUT RUN

PKWY. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GWMP (SB)

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. ABANDONED QUARRY

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This combination prestressed concrete multi-beam and slab-on-grade structure is in good condition overall. The deck and roadway expansion joint sealant is deteriorated and the expansion joints should be cleaned and resealed to limit moisture leakage onto the structure. Also, there is construction debris on the bearing seats at both abutments. This debris can retain moisture, contributing to deterioration of the structure and should be removed. Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

It should be noted that the approaches have been repaved and the roadway restriped since the last inspection.

INSPECTION TEAM: M.R. PUTALLAZ, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/17/11

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL DECK AND ROADWAY EXPANSION JOINTS. 86 LF

60.3 REMOVE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. 2 EA

58, 60 PERIODICALLY REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH ON AND AROUND STRUCTURE. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G1. DECK SLAB

F2. EXPANSION JOINTS

N3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

G6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

G1. BEARING DEVICES

G2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1 PAVEMENT MARKINGS HAVE BEEN RESTRIPED SINCE LAST

INSPECTION. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AND UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANG. MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST

SIDE.

58.2 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF DECK AND ROADWAY EXPANSION

JOINT SEALANT.

58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR FACE OF

PARAPET. MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS AND JOINT SEALANT THROUGHOUT. MINOR TO

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON PARAPET.

59.1 MINOR TO MODERATE CORROSION OF BEARING ANCHOR BOLTS

BELOW SOLE PLATES.

60.1 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST END

OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. MINOR VEGETATION

GROWTH ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

60.3 MINOR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON BEARING SEATS.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL AND MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.

60.6 MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G

FOUNDATIONS5. N

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. G

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N

FOUNDATIONS16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. G

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL 7

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL G

N N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N

222.1 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH SLAB.

MINOR SPALL (8"L X 12"W X 1"D) AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF

NORTH APPROACH SLAB FILLED WITH ASPHALT SINCE LAST

INSPECTION.

222.4 APPROACHES HAVE BEEN REPAVED SINCE LAST INSPECTION.

223.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RETAINING WALL

UNDER STRUCTURE.

223.4 MINOR EROSION ALONG RETAINING WALL WITH MINOR

UNDERMINING NEAR MIDSPAN.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 25 23 42 38

HS 36 33 60 54

TYPE 3 35 32 58 53

TYPE 3S2 42 38 69 63

TYPE 3-3 46 42 77 70

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... ABANDONED QUARRY BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 013 - ARLINGTON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3300-043P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... ABANDONED QUARRY

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 043P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. GWMP (SB)

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 7 - URBAN PARKWAY (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3300043P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES SOUTH OF SPOUT

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1A61 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 7.89 (KM PT 12.70)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 195 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

98.5 FT (30.0 M)

102.5 FT (31.2 M)

1 - SILL

1 - SILL

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 9 - OTHER

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 1 - EPOXY COATED REINF.

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (54.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°54'05.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 42.5 FT (13.0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°05'07.30" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 45.0 FT (13.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 52.0 FT (15.9 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 41.0 FT (12.5 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 7.0 FT (2.1 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 56300 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2005 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 61930 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 42.5 FT (13.0 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2025 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.50 FT (0.76 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 111N

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2010-ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

STRUCTURE 043P IS 45.0' WIDE WITH 19' OF WIDTH CONSISTING OF FOUR AASHTO BEAMS AND THE REMAINING WIDTH

CONSISTING OF ROADWAY ON GRADE. STRUCTURE HAS STEEP EMBANKMENT SLOPES.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�05'07.30 http:38�54'05.60

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-043P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD I-495

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

DECK AND ROADWAY EXPANSION JOINT

SEALANT; NORTH EXPANSION JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; NORTH

END SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT IN

PARAPET; NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - SPALL AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH APPROACH

SLAB FILLED WITH ASPHALT

PHOTO #8 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH SLAB

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE; BETWEEN BEAMS #3 AND #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #12 - EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL; ALSO NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON BEARING SEATS;

BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - EROSION ALONG RETAINING WALL WITH UNDERMINING

NEAR MIDSPAN

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .