A002 Attachment__Pgs M-7 to M14 in Word..doc
DOC document 197 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Coffman Cove SATOC IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- DTFH70-09-R-00015
About this file
Word version pages M-7 through M-14
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page M-10
Work Experience Form – Factors 1 and 2 (Completed & submitted by Offeror)
Factor 1 – Geographically relevant Experience
Factor 2 - Recent and relevant highway/road construction experience (work elements)
Directions: Complete this form for EACH project submitted for evaluation that meets or exceeds the stated criteria for Factor 1and/or Factor 2 (see page M-3 and M-4 for the evaluation criteria.) Submit this completed form with your proposal.
Offeror Information:
Company Name:
Company Address:
Point of Contact:
Phone Number:
*E-mail Address:
*Company Website:
* This information is optional
Project Information:
Project Name
Contract Number
Is this project located in SE Alaska? ( )YES ( ) NO
Definition: Southeast Alaska begins at the state line south of Ketchikan and extends north along the Alaska Panhandle to Yakutat.
Project Location (Town/State/Forest…)
Owner/Agency
Agency Contact:
Contact Phone #:
Contract Information for this project:
Our firm was the PRIME:
YES
NO
If PRIME, list # of subcontractors
| If PRIME, insert Total Value of Subcontracts: |
| $ |
Contract Award Date:
Contract Start Date:
Original Completion Date:
Final Completion Date:
| Initial Contract Value: |
| $ |
| Final Contract Value: |
| $ |
# of Contract Modifications
| Aggregate sum of all modifications: |
| $ |
| Work completed by the offeror: (enter % and $ value) |
| % |
| $ |
Work Elements found in this project (submitted by Offeror) NOTE: If this project will not be used to show us your experience in the following work elements, do not complete this page.
NOTE: Use this form or an equivalent size document. Documents exceeding the size of this form will be truncated before evaluation.
| Check if applicable |
| Work Element |
| Narrative (Submit enough information for the government to determine if you meet the criteria for Evaluation Factor 2 (see page M-4 for evaluation criteria). Information submitted that was not requested will not be evaluated. |
Material source development
Organic material (muskeg) subexcavation
Fish pipe installation Fish pipe installation
(cont)
Aggregate production
Aggregate Placement
Shot Rock Production
Paving
Contract Management Past Performance (Completed and submitted by Offeror)
Directions: Complete this form for EACH project submitted for evaluation that meets or exceeds the stated criteria for Factor 3 (see page M-5). In addition, you must ensure the government agency, private contractor submits the Contract Management Past Performance Questionnaire (see pages M-13 & M-14) for this project.
Company Information:
Company Name:
Company Address:
Point of Contact:
Phone Number:
*E-mail Address:
*Company Website:
* This information is optional
Past Performance Project Information:
Project Name
Contract Number
Project Location
Owner/Agency Address:
Revised by A002
Owner/Agency:
Contact Name:
Contact Phone No
Date Questionnaire Form for this project sent to this Agency/owner:
Contract Information for this project:
Our firm was the PRIME:
YES
NO
If PRIME, list number of subcontractor:
| If PRIME, insert total value of subcontracts: |
| $ |
Contract Award Date:
Contract Start Date:
Original Completion Date:
Final Completion Date:
| Was liquidated damages assessed for late completion? |
| __ Yes |
| __ No |
| If yes explain in narrative. |
# of Contract Modifications
| Aggregate sum of all modifications: |
| $ |
Work completed by the offeror: (enter % and $ value)
| % |
| $ |
INSTRUCTIONS for Narrative. Submit a narrative in the following format:
Submit 3 hardcopies as follows:
· Page 1 of this form
· Page 2 of this form, Narrative, answering the questions. You may use the block below or attach 1 page of text and 1 page of photos.
· Maximum 1 page text
· Maximum 1 pages photos.
· 8 ½” by 11” sheets of paper.
· Each page of each copy should contain the following legend: “Source Selection Information”
When is this form submitted?
Completed document should be submitted with your initial proposal.
Narrative – Answer these questions:
(Begin narrative below or attach similar document to first page of this form)
1a. Did your firm have other projects under construction during the performance of this contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No
1b. If “yes”, briefly describe the other project(s) including type of work, award amount, Owner/agency, and describe the skills used by your firms when managing these multiple projects.
2a. Did this project have multiple work sites that were under construction simultaneously? ( ) Yes ( ) No
2b. If yes, describe the skills used when managing this project with multiple sites.
Project Past Performance Questionnaire (Part A - Completed by Offeror & sent to Owner/Agency)
(Parts B & C - completed & submitted by Owner/Agency)
Directions Part A – To be completed by the Offeror, who then sends form to Owner/Agency.
Parts B & C – To be completed by the Owner/Agency and submitted directly to:
ATTN: Julee McTaggart
FAX: (360) 619-7932
(Mailroom – do not open) PHONE: (360) 619-7584
Federal Highway Administration E-MAIL: wfl.contracts@fhwa.dot.gov 610 East Fifth Street
Vancouver, WA 98661-3801
Part A - General Information (to be completed by the Offeror):
Contractor’s Name
Contractor Address
Owner/Agency
Contact Name:
Contact Phone Number:
Project Title
Project Number
Contract Number
Project Location
What work did Contractor perform under this contract?
Part B - Contract Information for project listed above (to be completed by the Owner/Agency):
Contract Award Date:
Contract Start Date:
Original Completion Date:
Final Completion Date:
| Were liquidated damages assessed for late completion? |
| __ Yes |
| __ No |
| Was a contractor evaluation prepared? |
| __ Yes |
| __ No |
| If yes, what was the overall rating? |
Project Past Performance Questionnaire (Completed and submitted by Owner/Agency)
Evaluation Factor Rating System. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings:
N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory P=Poor F=Fair G=Good E=Excellent O=Outstanding
· Unsatisfactory--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
· Poor--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective
· Fair--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
· Good--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
· Excellent--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective
· Outstanding--The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. (It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent".)
For ratings of “Unsatisfactory” and “Poor” please provide a brief explanation in the remarks section.
Part C - Rating for project listed on reverse (to be completed by the Owner/Agency):
| The Contractor’s Cooperation and responsiveness was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The Contractor’s management of resources & personnel was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The contractor’s coordination & control of subcontractors was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The contractor’s compliance with laws & regulations was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The contractor’s professional conduct was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The contractor’s review and resolution of subcontractor issues was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The Contractor’s ability to foresee future problems and account for them to prevent delays was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
| The Contractor’s ability to adequately staff the project office to ensure accuracy and timeliness of the document submittals was? |
| N/A |
| U |
| P |
| F |
| G |
| E |
| O |
Remarks:
Source Selection Information
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
(Applicable when filled-in)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .