BRDCOM-S3612-reference-questionnaire~1.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lobbying and Public Relations Services
- Solicitation number
- BRDCOM-S3612
- Issued by
- Churchill County, Nevada
About this file
This is a reference questionnaire issued by the Nevada State Purchasing Division, Department of Administration, in connection with solicitation number BRDCOM-S3612. The document serves as an evaluation tool for assessing vendor performance and qualifications during the formal procurement process. Vendors are required to provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. Completed reference questionnaires must be submitted to Joel Wixon, Purchasing Officer, at j.wixon@admin.nv.gov with the solicitation number in the subject line by January 26, 2026. The State of Nevada requests comprehensive responses to all evaluation questions, with answers marked as "U/K" if unknown or "N/A" if not applicable. References may be contacted for further clarification beyond the written questionnaire responses.
The questionnaire evaluates vendors across thirteen primary rating categories using a scale of 0-10, with 0 representing poor or inadequate performance, 1-3 indicating below average performance, 4-6 reflecting average performance, 7-9 demonstrating above average performance, and 10 indicating exceptional performance. Evaluation criteria include vendor knowledge and expertise, flexibility regarding scope and timeline changes, satisfaction with delivered materials and developed products, staff dynamics and interaction, schedule adherence and timeliness of deliverables, customer service and issue resolution, billing accuracy and timeliness, business requirement flexibility, and local office responsiveness. Completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information under Nevada Revised Statutes and are not public information. The questionnaire also requests open-ended responses identifying the vendor's most satisfactory aspects and the client's likelihood of recommending the vendor for future work.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 43ADG-S3625 Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| 43ADG-S3625 SoW_Lighting Controls_Service Contract_REV 1-12-2026.pdf | ||
| 43ADG-S3625 Terms-and-conditions-for-services.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3612 Standard-form-contract.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3612 Certification-regarding-lobbying.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3612 Cost Schedule.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3612 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.pdf | ||
| 44DOC-S3623 NDOC OMS RFI.docx | DOCX document | |
| Quote Instructions .pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3612 Terms-and-conditions-for-services.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3612-Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3612 NOI.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3612 RFP~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 44DOC-S3623 Bid_Q_A_responses.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Reference questionnaire
Due Date 01/26/2026
Solicitation number BRDCOM-S3612
Single point of contact name Joel Wixon, Purchasing Officer 2
Single point of contact email j.wixon@admin.nv.gov
Proposing vendor or subcontractor
Client providing the reference
Client contact name and title
Client telephone and email
Period of performance
1. Client reference instructions
1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposing vendor or subcontractor above. Once you have completed the reference questionnaire, please submit to the single point of contact via email, with the solicitation number in the subject line, no later than the due date above.
1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach additional pages. If attaching additional pages, please place your company/organization name on each page and reference the appropriate RFP number.
1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) and not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333. In addition to the reference questionnaire, the State may contact references for further clarification.
Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3; Average performance: 4-6; Above average performance: 7-9; Exceptional performance: 10.
Evaluation items
In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating)
Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating:
Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating:
Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating:
Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating:
Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating:
Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating:
Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating:
Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating:
Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating:
Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating:
Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating:
Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating:
Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating)
Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating)
Revised 2024-10 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1 Reference questionnaire image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .