BPM003283_Evaluation_Consensus_Score.xls

This document is an evaluation consensus scoring sheet for a state of Arizona procurement process, specifically for a Wildlife Waters Construction and Redevelopment/Wildlife Habitat Construction General Contractor solicitation (BPM003283). Twelve different construction firms were evaluated by three independent evaluators, including Action Direct dba Redpoint Contracting, Clay Bundy Construction Inc, Copperstate Earthworks, Hylan-West, IOI Construction Corp, MD Merrett Ranch to Ranch, SDB Inc, Smith Shurtliff and Smith, Spencer Construction, and Windsor Underground.

The evaluation assessed contractors across three primary criteria: Experience and Reliability (40 points), Firm's Demonstrated Experience (40 points), and Method of Approach (10 points), totaling 90 possible points. Based on the consensus scoring, Smith Shurtliff and Smith emerged as the top-ranked proposer with 82 points, followed by Copperstate Earthworks and MD Merrett (tied at 79 points). The evaluation specifically focused on selecting the most advantageous service provider for wildlife water construction and habitat development projects. The document indicates a competitive selection process with detailed scoring that considered each firm's technical capabilities, past performance, and proposed approach to the project.