B08_GOGA_SEKI_Ash_Mountain_Att_8_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_Exp.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SEKI REHABILITATE ASH MOUNTAIN HELIBASE
- Solicitation number
- 140P8625R0005
About this file
This document is a Project Experience Questionnaire for a federal solicitation related to rehabilitating the Ash Mountain Helibase at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). The questionnaire requires detailed responses about prior project experience, focusing on seven key areas including project description, contractor roles, pricing, schedule changes, problem resolution, and successful project methods. The solicitation involves multiple contractors, with Sparky's Electrical Company listed as the prime contractor and ABC Plumbing & Heating as a subcontractor, demonstrating their past project collaboration and capabilities.
The specific solicitation (140P8625R0005) is issued by the Department of the Interior's National Park Service Pacific West Region, seeking detailed project experience documentation to evaluate potential contractors' qualifications for the Ash Mountain Helibase rehabilitation project. The questionnaire instructs offerors to provide comprehensive project details, including original and final pricing, performance periods, contractor roles, and demonstrative evidence of successful project execution, with responses to be tailored to the requirements specified in Section L of the solicitation document.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P8425RXXXX
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions provided in Section L of the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .