B08.13 - Attachment 13 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 52 KB Posted

Attached to
Scientific, Technical Research and Project Management Support Services for USAMRIID Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HT942525R0005
Issued by
Defense Health Agency

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire designed to assess and rate a contractor's performance across multiple evaluation criteria. The questionnaire provides four rating levels (Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence) and requires detailed rationale for evaluations in key areas including compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness, performance timeliness, cost control, and customer satisfaction. Respondents are asked to complete sections identifying contract details, contractor information, and provide comprehensive performance assessments with specific ratings and written explanations for each evaluation category.

The form is intended to be completed by a point of contact familiar with the contractor's performance, who will provide candid and factual information to assist in federal contract award decisions. The questionnaire includes sections for contract identification, contractor representative details, performance evaluation across six distinct dimensions, general comments, and respondent identification. The goal is to collect thorough, objective performance data that will help contracting officers make informed decisions about a contractor's capabilities and past performance quality.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Scientific, Technical Research and Project Management Support Services for USAMRIID, newest first.
File Type Posted
B08 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0002.docx DOCX document
B08.02 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0001_Attachment 02 - QASP_rev 04.29.2025.docx DOCX document
B08.04 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0001_Attachment 04 - Labor Categories and Descriptions_rev 04.29.2025.pdf PDF
B08.14 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0001_Attachment 14 - Pricing Sheet_04.29.2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0001.docx DOCX document
B08.16 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0001_Attachment 16 - Offerors Questions and Answers_04.29.2025.pdf PDF
B08.01 - HT942525R0005 Amend 0001_Attachment 01 - Performance Work Statement_rev 04.29.2025.docx DOCX document
B08 - HT942525R0005_Science Support Services.docx DOCX document
B08.11 - Attachment 11 - BPRP Factors to Consider.pdf PDF
B08.05 - Attachment 05 - Historical LOE Key Personnel and BPRP_CS-PRP Requirement.pdf PDF
B08.06 - Attachment 06 - DD254.pdf PDF
B08.09 - Attachment 09 - DA Form 3180-2.pdf PDF
B08.10 - Attachment 10 - DA Form 7708.pdf PDF
B08.01 - Attachment 01 - Performance Work Statement.docx DOCX document
B08.03 - Attachment 03 - Non-Disclosure Statement.docx DOCX document
B08.07 - Attachment 07 - List of GFP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08.12 - Attachment 12 - OCI Certification.docx DOCX document
B08.02 - Attachment 02 - QASP.docx DOCX document
B08.04 - Attachment 04 - Labor Categories and Descriptions.pdf PDF
B08.08 - Attachment 08 - DA Form 3180-1.pdf PDF
B08.14 - Attachment 14 - Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08.15 - Attachment 15 - WD 2015-4269 rev 28.pdf PDF
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 13

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor’s name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .