The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
The National Park Service is currently in the process of selecting a Contractor to provide all labor, materials, equipment and travel necessary for completion of the Roof Replacement on the Eisenhower House at Eisenhower National Historic Site located in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The project requires the replacement of approximately 6,400 sq. ft. of slate roof, and selective repairs to the roof sheathing, gutters, chimney flashing, and soffits. This work will extend the life of the structure by securing the exterior envelope and protecting the interior from exterior elements.
As required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at Paragraph 12.606, Offeror’s past performance history will play an important role in determining which Contractor will receive the contract.
As someone with first-hand knowledge of the past performance history pertaining to one of the competitors for this project, your participation is essential. The National Park Service depends on your critical evaluation of the prospective Contractor’s performance to ensure we are obtaining the best value for your tax dollars.
The acquisition schedule is extremely tight; therefore, we need your written response no later than June 2, 2023. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, we have formulated the attached questionnaire highlighting the areas of primary interest to the National Park Service.
The questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed to the attention of Ruth Pagan at ruth_pagan@nps.gov.
If you have any questions concerning completion of the attached questionnaire, please contact the undersigned at (254) 258 - 9274
//SIGNED//
Ruth Pagan Contracting Officer
1 Attachment – Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
| Point of Contact |
| Name, Email, Phone |
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION
| Contract Number |
| XXXXXXXXXX |
| Contract Type |
| Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other |
| Awarded Contract Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Current / Final Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Contract Award Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Contract Completion Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Period of Performance |
| XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX |
| Project Location |
| Park or Street address, City, State |
| Brief description of the contract & work effort: |
| Scope of work description |
C. REFERENCE:
| Organization |
| Agency or Company |
| Phone Number |
| XXX-XXX-XXXX |
D. EVALUATION
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Quality
| Quality of workmanship (including subcontracts)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of and adherence to quality control? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of informational and technical submittals? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Quality Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Schedule & Time Management)
| Met project schedule milestones and maintained the schedule? |
| Choose an item. |
| Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? |
| Choose an item. |
| Informational and technical deliverables submitted timely? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly addressed scheduling issues? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Cost Control
| Meet the contract cost or stay within the fixed-price cost? |
| Choose an item. |
| Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? |
| Choose an item. |
| Submitted accurate and complete invoices? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly paid subconsultants? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Cost Control Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Management
| General oversight and effective communication by project manager with subcontractors, Contracting Officer, and Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) on problems solving and recommending solutions and shows initiative in overcoming obstacles? |
| Choose an item. |
| Coordination with and control of subconsultants in achieving timely performance, relaying quality control concerns, and working with subcontractors to correct deficiencies and resolve problem areas? |
| Choose an item. |
| Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Met your working relationship expectations (e.g. ease of working with, flexible in accommodating program adjustments, reasonable/cooperative behavior, businesslike concerns for your interest, etc.)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness, and cooperation in resolving potential problems? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Management Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Regulatory Compliance
| Met building and life safety codes? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Recommendation: |
| Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Comments: |
E. RETURN:
| Return by |
| On or before June 2, 2023, 12:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) |
| Title |
| Contracting Officer |
| Organization |
| National Park Service – WCO/Historic Preservation Training Center |
image1.jpg