B08_Attachment_09_Proposal_Submission_Package_BULLFROG.docx
DOCX document 74 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GLCA 318882 Bullfrog
- Solicitation number
- 140P2026R0010
About this file
This file is a Proposal Submission Package for a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the National Park Service Denver Service Center for the Glen Canyon Recreation Area project to provide lake access to the Bullfrog Area (Solicitation 140P2026R0010, PMIS GLCA 318882).
The package contains mandatory submission forms that offerors must complete, including: (1) a Project Experience Questionnaire requesting detailed information about referenced projects, contractor roles, pricing history, schedule performance, problem resolution, and means and methods; (2) a Contract Price Schedule requiring submission of a minimum Firm-Fixed-Price offer for base line items and all option line items with lump-sum pricing on designated items; (3) a Past Performance Questionnaire to be completed by offerors and transmitted to project references for evaluation across Quality, Schedule and Time Management, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards, and Regulatory Compliance categories using a five-tier rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory; and (4) a General References form requesting contact information for sureties, corporate banks, insurance companies, subcontractors, and material suppliers. Completed questionnaires and supporting documentation must be returned by the proposal due date to Contracting Officer Tony Jasper at Anthony_jasper@ios.doi.gov. This is a two-phase design-build procurement under FAR 36.3, with Phase 1 proposals currently being solicited without pricing information.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GLEN CANYON RECREATION AREA
Provide Lake Access to Bullfrog Area
140P2026R0010
GLCA 318882
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
Proposal Submission Package
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
DENVER SERVICE CENTER
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2026R0010
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 140P2026R0010
PARK - PMIS: GLCA 318882
PROJECT TITLE: Provide Lake Access to Bullfrog Area
Offerors are required to submit, at a minimum, one (1) Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line items and all option line items. Please complete Attachment XX Contract Price Schedule (include this sentence if not using table below). Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of summation error, the total corrected amounts govern. Round totals and extended prices to whole dollars. Refer to section “H” of this solicitation for additional information regarding contract options.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. 140P2026R0010
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
| Company Name |
| Company |
| Street Address |
| Address |
| City |
| City |
| State |
| State |
| Zip Code |
| XXXXX |
| Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM |
| XXXXXXX |
| Point of Contact |
| Name, Email, Phone |
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE)
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Contract Number |
| XXXXXXXXXX |
| Contract Type |
| Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other |
| Awarded Contract Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Current / Final Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Contract Award Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Contract Completion Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Period of Performance |
| XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX |
| Project Location |
| Park or Street address, City, State |
| Client / Owner |
| Company |
| Brief description of the contract & work effort: |
| Scope of work description |
C. REFERENCE:
| Name |
| First, Last |
| Position / Title |
| Title |
| Organization |
| Agency or Company |
| Phone Number |
| XXX-XXX-XXXX |
| Email Address |
| Signature |
| Signature |
| Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
D. EVALUATION
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Evaluation Area |
| Rating |
Quality
| Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of informational and technical submittals? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Quality Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Schedule (& Time Management)
| Met project schedule milestones? |
| Choose an item. |
| Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? |
| Choose an item. |
| Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly addressed scheduling issues? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Cost Control
| Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? |
| Choose an item. |
| Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? |
| Choose an item. |
| Submitted accurate and complete invoices? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Cost Control Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Management
| General oversight by project manager and superintendent? |
| Choose an item. |
| Coordination with and control of subcontractors? |
| Choose an item. |
| Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? |
| Choose an item. |
| Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? |
| Choose an item. |
| Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Management Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)
| Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? |
| Choose an item. |
| Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Regulatory Compliance
| Met building and life safety codes? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Recommendation: |
| Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Comments: |
E. RETURN:
| Return by |
| Proposal due date/time |
| Name |
| Tony Jasper |
| Title |
| Contracting Officer |
| Organization |
| National Park Service – Denver Service Center |
| Anthony_jasper@ios.doi.gov |
General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:
SURETY
Name of Surety:
Address of Surety:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
CORPORATE BANK
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
CORPORATE BANK
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
INSURANCE COMPANY
Name:
Address:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types of Policies:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
image1.wmf image2.emf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .