B08_Attachment_09_Proposal_Submission_Package_BULLFROG.docx

DOCX document 74 KB Posted

Attached to
GLCA 318882 Bullfrog
Solicitation number
140P2026R0010
Issued by

About this file

This file is a Proposal Submission Package for a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the National Park Service Denver Service Center for the Glen Canyon Recreation Area project to provide lake access to the Bullfrog Area (Solicitation 140P2026R0010, PMIS GLCA 318882).

The package contains mandatory submission forms that offerors must complete, including: (1) a Project Experience Questionnaire requesting detailed information about referenced projects, contractor roles, pricing history, schedule performance, problem resolution, and means and methods; (2) a Contract Price Schedule requiring submission of a minimum Firm-Fixed-Price offer for base line items and all option line items with lump-sum pricing on designated items; (3) a Past Performance Questionnaire to be completed by offerors and transmitted to project references for evaluation across Quality, Schedule and Time Management, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards, and Regulatory Compliance categories using a five-tier rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory; and (4) a General References form requesting contact information for sureties, corporate banks, insurance companies, subcontractors, and material suppliers. Completed questionnaires and supporting documentation must be returned by the proposal due date to Contracting Officer Tony Jasper at Anthony_jasper@ios.doi.gov. This is a two-phase design-build procurement under FAR 36.3, with Phase 1 proposals currently being solicited without pricing information.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

GLEN CANYON RECREATION AREA

Provide Lake Access to Bullfrog Area

140P2026R0010

GLCA 318882

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

(RFP)

Proposal Submission Package

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

DENVER SERVICE CENTER

Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2026R0010

Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).

Offeror
Company Name

REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Title
Title
Project Location
City, State
Brief Project Description
Description
Project Owner
Company Name
POC:
First & Last Name
Phone:
(XXX) XXX-XXXX

CONTRACTOR LIST

List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.

Contractor Name
Role on Referenced Project

(Prime or Sub)

Trade
Price

(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)

Original
Final
Original
Final
Sparky’s Electrical Company
Prime
Prime
$XXX,XXX
$X,XXX,XXX
XX
XX
ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co
Subcontractor
Plumbing & Mechanical
$X,XXX,XXX
$X,XXX,XXX
XXX
XXX

Subcontractor

PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS

1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.

Response

2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.

Response

3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.

Response

4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.

Response

5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.

Response

6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?

Response

7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.

Response

CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: 140P2026R0010

PARK - PMIS: GLCA 318882

PROJECT TITLE: Provide Lake Access to Bullfrog Area

Offerors are required to submit, at a minimum, one (1) Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line items and all option line items. Please complete Attachment XX Contract Price Schedule (include this sentence if not using table below). Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of summation error, the total corrected amounts govern. Round totals and extended prices to whole dollars. Refer to section “H” of this solicitation for additional information regarding contract options.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P2026R0010

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE)

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by
Proposal due date/time
Name
Tony Jasper
Title
Contracting Officer
Organization
National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email
Anthony_jasper@ios.doi.gov

General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.

It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.

NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:

SURETY

Name of Surety:

Address of Surety:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

CORPORATE BANK

Name of Bank:

Address of Bank:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Types and Numbers of Accounts:

CORPORATE BANK

Name of Bank:

Address of Bank:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Types and Numbers of Accounts:

INSURANCE COMPANY

Name:

Address:

Name of Agent:

Telephone Number:

Types of Policies:

SUBCONTRACTOR

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Area of Specialized Work:

SUBCONTRACTOR

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Area of Specialized Work:

SUBCONTRACTOR

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Area of Specialized Work:

MATERIAL SUPPLIER

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Types of Material:

MATERIAL SUPPLIER

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Types of Material:

MATERIAL SUPPLIER

Name:

Address:

Name of Contact:

Telephone Number:

Types of Material:

image1.wmf image2.emf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .