B08_Attachment_07_Project_Experience_Questionnaire_-_Copy_(2).docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OLYM - FAIRHOLME CG ABAAS IMPROVEMENTS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P8326R0006
About this file
This file is a Project Experience Questionnaire template designed to capture contractor qualifications and past project performance relevant to the Fairholme Campground ABAAS Improvements contract at Olympic National Park. The document serves as an evaluation tool to assess bidder capability and experience rather than specifying contract requirements or deliverables.
As a template document, this questionnaire does not contain specific response dates, pricing information, award dates, or other substantive contract terms. Instead, it functions as an appendix or evaluation criterion that prospective contractors would complete to demonstrate their experience with similar projects involving accessibility improvements, site construction, utility connections, trail development, and related campground infrastructure work. The questionnaire would typically request information such as project descriptions, scope of work completed, budget ranges, completion dates, client references, and team qualifications to allow the National Park Service to evaluate whether bidders possess the necessary expertise to successfully execute the Fairholme Campground construction project.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P8326R0006
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions provided in Section L of the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .