B08_Atch_6_Solit_Vol1_PastPerQ_-_MIIN_HAFO.docx

DOCX document 45 KB Posted

Attached to
MIIN 314972 & HAFO 314578 Rehab ID Parks Ops Bldgs
Solicitation number
140P2025R0015
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation No. 140P2025R0015, related to rehabilitation of operations buildings at Minidoka National Historic Site (MIIN) and Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument (HAFO). The form is designed to capture detailed performance evaluations across multiple criteria including quality, schedule management, cost control, project management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. References are asked to rate the contractor's performance using a five-tier rating system from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional, with specific evaluation areas such as workmanship quality, schedule adherence, cost control effectiveness, management oversight, and compliance with labor and safety standards.

The solicitation involves rehabilitation of operations buildings, with the contract likely being a firm fixed-price, time and materials, or cost-reimbursable type. The form indicates the contract is being evaluated by the National Park Service - Denver Service Center, with a focus on gathering comprehensive past performance information for source selection purposes. The questionnaire requires detailed input from project references to provide an objective assessment of the contractor's previous performance, which will be used to determine the contractor's capability to successfully execute similar future contracts.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B09_Amd_4_MIIN314972_FinalCD_Drawings_C400-R2_0004.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0015_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_4_MIIN314972_FinalCD_Drawings_C600-R2_0004.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_4_MIIN_HAFO_QA_4_21_25_0004.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0015_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_2_MIIN_HAFO_Q_A_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0015_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_2_ClausesT_C_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Amd_2_MIIN_314972_and_HAFO_314578_Pre-bid_Walkthrough_Sign_In_Sheets_0002.pdf PDF
B09_Atch_4_MIIN314972_FinalCD_Drawings-Rev1_0001.pdf PDF
B09_Atch_1_HAFO314578_FinalCD_Specs_Rev1_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0015_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B09_Atch_2__HAFO314578_FinalCD_Drawings_Rev1_0001.pdf PDF
B09_Atch_3_MIIN314972_FinalCD_Specs-Rev1_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0015.pdf PDF
B08_Atch_1_HAFO_314578_Specifications_-_Final_UPDATED.pdf PDF
B08_Atch_9_Brand_Name_J_A_FAR_6_302_-_HAFO.pdf PDF
B08_Atch_4_MIIN_314972_Drawings_-_Final_UPDATED.pdf PDF
B08_Atch5_WD_Jerome.pdf PDF
B08_140P2025R0015_Clauses_Provisions_v7_Mar_2025Rev_-_MIIN_HAFO.pdf PDF
B08_Atch_7_Solit_Vol2_ContractPriceSchedule_-_HAFO_MIIN.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Atch_3_MIIN_314972_Specifications_-_Final_UPDATED.pdf PDF
B08_Atch_2_HAFO_314578_Drawings__-_Final_UPDATED.pdf PDF
B08_Atch_8_Solit_Vol2_SubLimitations_-_MIIN_HAFO.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P2025R0015 – MIIN & HAFO

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE)

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by
Time / Date
Name
CO or CS name
Title
Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist
Organization
National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email
First_Last@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .