B08_140P1426R0003_Attachment_8_Project_Experience_Form.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GRTE Taggart Lake Area Renewal - PMIS 314711
- Solicitation number
- 140P1426R0003
About this file
This is a Project Experience Form template for solicitation 140P1426R0003, which requires offerors to demonstrate relevant experience on past projects similar to the Grand Teton National Park Taggart Lake Area Renewal project. The form instructs contractors to submit information about referenced projects that align with the Project Experience evaluation subfactor outlined in solicitation section L, limiting submissions to the quantity of projects and timeframes specified in the solicitation documents.
The form requires offerors to provide detailed information on contractor experience, including project title, location, owner, and a complete contractor list identifying whether each entity served as prime or subcontractor, along with their specific trade, original and final pricing, and original and final performance periods in calendar days. Offerors must then respond to seven substantive questions addressing the specific work performed, how that work aligns with the stated Project Experience elements, reasons for any price and schedule changes, problems encountered and their resolutions, successful means and methods employed, and any additional relevant project information. The template is expandable to multiple pages to accommodate comprehensive responses for multiple referenced projects.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Form Solicitation 140P1426R0003 - Grand Teton National Park, Taggart Lake Area Renewal, PMIS 314711
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .