B08_140P1426R0002_Attachment_8_Project_Experience_Form.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GRTE MORMON ROW LANDSCAPE REHAB
- Solicitation number
- 140P1426R0002
About this file
This is a Project Experience Form template for solicitation 140P1426R0002, which requires offerors to submit documented experience on similar projects as part of their proposal evaluation. The form requests that contractors provide information about referenced projects including project title, location, description, owner details, and a list of all contractors (prime and subcontractors) involved with their specific roles, prices, and performance periods. Offerors must identify which project experience elements from the solicitation's evaluation criteria their previous work addresses and explain any cost or schedule variations from original estimates.
The form includes seven substantive questions requiring offerors to describe the work performed, identify relevant experience elements, explain reasons for price and schedule changes, detail problems encountered and resolutions, discuss successful means and methods, and provide any additional relevant project information. This template applies to the Grand Teton National Park Mormon Row Cultural Landscape Improvements Phase IV project, a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business set-aside valued under NAICS code 237310 (Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction) with a $45 million small business size standard. The project involves landscape repairs, trail resurfacing, accessibility improvements, parking area construction, wayfinding signage, and site amenities at a historic cultural landscape in Wyoming, with work scheduled for 2026 while maintaining public access to Mormon Row Road.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Form Solicitation 140P1426R0002 - GRTE Mormon Row Cultural Landscape Improvements - Phase IV - PMIS 228830
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .