B04_Attachment_6_EVALUATION_FACTORS_TABLE.pdf

Source Selection Plan – Evaluation Factors Proposal Submission Instructions Evaluation Plan

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

SUBFACTOR 1.1: Technical Approach

Using the task’s outline from the scope of work, describe the technical approach to accomplish each task.

The offeror’s submission will be evaluated as to the extent it demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the scope requirements. The proposed methodology for completing the tasks will be evaluated in terms of feasibility and the ability to efficiently accomplish the tasks.

SUBFACTOR 1.2: Technical Experience Identify three past hospitality projects where offeror developed a dynamic financial model.

Without divulging any confidential information, the following questions must be answered for each project:

• What was the purpose of the model?

• What elements did the offeror’s client require through its scope of work within the model?

• Describe how the offeror’s model was capable of testing outcomes using different variables.

Client contact information must be included for each project described.

Offerors that provide three past hospitality projects that demonstrate experience developing dynamic financial models for hospitality projects will receive a higher rating. The offeror’s submission will be evaluated as to the extent it demonstrates the offeror’s capability to develop financial models related to the hospitality industry that meet or exceed clients’ scope of work requirements.

FACTOR 2: MANAGEMENT APROACH

2.0.1.1 SUBFACTOR 2.1: Key Personnel and Staffing Approach

***SEE ATTACHMENT 2 – PRICE SCHEDULE – TAB 2 (LABOR CATEGORY DESCRIPTIONS) FOR

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS FOR EACH LABOR CATEGORY***

Provide a list of all potential key personnel (Prime Consultant only). The Government considers two individuals from the consultant team as key personnel- the project manager and lead financial analyst. For each person, describe as applicable, their education and experience including private sector hospitality expertise in lodging, food and beverage, and retail, etc., project management, and financial analysis.

The qualifications and prior experience of the offeror’s proposed key personnel will be evaluated to determine the proposed team’s ability to successfully complete the requirements listed in Attachment 1 Scope of Work. Offerors providing key personnel with higher qualifications regarding relevant education and experience in hospitality project management and financial analysis will be more favorably rated.

Provide a list of personnel not defined as key personnel (Prime Consultant only), to demonstrate the depth of the offeror’s team. For each person, describe as applicable, their education and experience including private sector hospitality expertise in lodging, food and beverage, and retail, etc., project management and financial analysis.

The qualifications and prior experience of the offeror’s proposed personnel will be evaluated to determine the proposed team’s ability to successfully complete the requirements listed in Attachment 1 Scope of Work. Offerors providing an adequate number of personnel with higher qualifications regarding relevant education and experience in hospitality project management and financial analysis and with the capability of

• Proposal must demonstrate an adequate number of qualified staff with private sector hospitality experiences in lodging, food and beverage, and retail, at a minimum, so in the event of personnel changes, projects transition seamlessly and without causing delay in the process.

• Proposal must demonstrate a depth of staff capable of working on multiple projects simultaneously.

working on multiple projects simultaneously will be more favorably rated.

Provide the name, description, and a summary of the experience of personnel or firms the offeror will team with to complete successfully the requirements listed in Attachment 1 Scope of Work. At minimum, provide information on personnel and/or firms with expertise in:

• Personal Property Valuation

• Marina industry (e.g., marina operations including vessels, passenger vessel expertise).

• Houseboat industry.

• Transportation industry.

For each firm listed above (as applicable), provide a letter of commitment from that firm. A letter of commitment only needs to confirm that the subcontractor firm is agreeable to the proposed partnership if awarded a contract under this solicitation. (Letters of commitments are excluded from the page limits for Factor 2.)

Offerors providing letters of commitment from personnel or firms the offeror will team with to successfully complete the requirements listed in Attachment 1 Scope of Work, including at a minimum those with personal property valuation, marina, houseboat, and transportation expertise, will be more favorably rated.

The Prime must have demonstrated experience providing hospitality consulting services in the private sector.

Offerors demonstrating experience providing hospitality consulting services in the private sector will be more favorable rated.

SUBFACTOR 2.2: Quality Assurance and Control Process Consultants will develop and use a quality assurance checklist. Provide an example of a checklist similar to the one the offeror will use for projects.

Offerors providing a quality assurance checklist that demonstrates that the Government’s standards for quality will be met or exceeded in the resultant IDIQ contract deliverables will be more favorably rated.

What management practices in addition to the checklist, will be implemented to guarantee a robust quality assurance program? Describe proposed procedures for quality control and accuracy of deliverables when completed both in-house and by a subcontractor (if subcontracting).

Offerors demonstrating management practices and procedures that guarantee a robust quality assurance and control program will be more favorably rated.

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

Uhlman, Lora C 2024-11-12 13:26:00 See changes to Attachment 02 as to why this was deleted.

Offerors should send up to five Past Performance Questionnaires, along with the cover memo that includes response instructions, to clients for whom they have recently performed duties similar in scope, magnitude and complexity to those required under this solicitation. Since return rates on Past Performance Questionnaires vary widely, the Government encourages bidders to forward as many questionnaires to their customers/clients as practicable to ensure an adequate response.

Provide a detailed listing of all clients the offeror sent a Past Performance Questionnaire to. The bidder is encouraged to use a table format for this submittal. At a minimum, include the following information:

Point of Contact (POC) Name POC Title Company Name Project Name / Contract Number POC Phone Number POC Fax Number POC E-Mail Address

Past performance will be evaluated in terms of overall relevancy to this project in terms of similarity in scope, magnitude, and complexity to those required under this solicitation. Offerors demonstrating a higher level of similarity and successful past performance in the evaluated areas will be more favorably rated.

If no recent or relevant performance record is available, the offeror will receive a neutral rating and will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

FACTOR 4: PRICE

Submit completed Attachment 4/Supplies or Services and Prices (Schedule), Attachment 2 to this Solicitation. Bidders are required to complete all the tabs including the Example Task Order Pricing (Hourly Labor Rate and Hours for each task) and the “Labor Category Description/Title” and “Hourly Labor Rate” areas of each Ordering Period tab.

Ensure the title description ties into the task the labor category. For example if the Senior Associate is primarily the financial analyst, include that in the labor category description.

Labor category mapping for items Labor Categories 1-12 on the IDIQ Price Schedule are considered mandatory but additional clarification or description may be added to these categories in proposals in order to ensure they map to appropriate vendor labor distribution plans.

Additional labor categories may be proposed as labor sub-categories that are found necessary to

The Government will analyze all hours and prices for consistency and determine if the proposed prices are reasonable. Price reasonableness will be determined considering other competitive prices received, comparison to the Independent Government Estimate and utilization of other price analysis techniques.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the price (rates) of one or more labor categories is significantly over-stated as demonstrated by the application of price analysis techniques.

satisfy solicitation requirements. Add as many lines into the Excel worksheet as needed for any labor category sub-category. Labor sub-categories must be mapped to a primary labor category, meet any and all stated requirements of that category, and rates for the sub category may not exceed the rate for the primary labor category. Ensure that the “Labor Category Description/Title” and the “Hourly Labor Rate” areas of Attachment 2, Price Schedule are completed.