Atth II PPQ.pdf
PDF 455 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SPE603-26-R-0514
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency Energy
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for federal contract SPE603-25-R-0516 MAKS AAF, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). The form is designed to collect contractor performance assessments from government clients and is submitted to Contract Specialist Richard Phelps at (717) 753-1551 or Richard.Phelps@dla.mil.
The questionnaire captures general contractor information including CAGE code, contract number, assessment period, contract dates, contract type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, or Other), performer status (Prime Contractor, Sub-Contractor, or Joint Venture), and work complexity level (High, Medium, or Low). Respondents must provide a brief description of work or supplies furnished. The form includes seven performance assessment categories: (1) Quality of Service, addressing conformance to specifications, technical expertise, personnel qualifications, and problem correction; (2) Schedule, evaluating timeliness of task completion and responsiveness to direction; (3) Cost Control, assessing budgeting and billing accuracy (marked Not Applicable for Firm Fixed Price contracts); (4) Management of Key Personnel, reviewing hiring, retention, and turnover practices; (5) Small Business Compliance, applicable only to domestic contracts; (6) Regulatory Compliance, covering financial, environmental, labor, and safety adherence; and (7) Business Relationships, examining communication and overall management effectiveness. Each category requires narrative explanation and a rating from five options: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory, with guidance that Exceptional through Marginal ratings equate to "Acceptable" for evaluation purposes, while Unsatisfactory equates to "Unacceptable."
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_SPE60326R05140008.PDF | ||
| Atth B_PWS.pdf | ||
| Atth A_QA Summary.pdf | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R05140007.pdf | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R05140006.pdf | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R05140005.pdf | ||
| Atth A_RFO Update list.pdf | ||
| Atth D_Maks PWS (4 May 2026).pdf | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R05140004.PDF | ||
| Atth C_Maks QA.pdf | ||
| Atth B_Maks Sec B-M.pdf | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R05140003.PDF | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R0514 0002.pdf | ||
| SF30_SPE60326R05140001.PDF | ||
| Atth V WD.pdf | ||
| Atth IV PP References.pdf | ||
| Atth I PWS.pdf | ||
| Atth III PP Consent Form.pdf | ||
| SPE60326R0514 RFP.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SPE603-25-R-0516 MAKS AAF
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE
GENERAL INFORMATION
Contractor Name CAGE Contract Number Assessment Period
Name of Point of Contact Email Address Phone Number Awarded Price
Contract Dates Contract Type Performed as: Complexity of Work
Award Date: _______________ End Date: _________________ Actual End Date: ___________
Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other _____________
Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Prime Name:
Joint Venture
High Medium Low
Brief Description of work/supplies furnished to Customer
CLIENT INFORMATION
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire Title Email Address
Client’s Signature and Date
RETURN INFORMATION
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WITH COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO:
Contract Specialist Phone Email Address
(717) 753-1551 Richard.Phelps@dla.mil
Attachment II PPQ
SPE603-26-R-0514
MAKS AAF
Richard Phelps
GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE
A. The questionnaire should be completed by the individual most knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of the services being rendered. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in their organization, as applicable.
B. Handwritten responses are sufficient. However, request they be legible.
C. Please provide explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible. These narratives need not be lengthy, just descriptive. Space for narrative comments is included after each question and on the last page of the survey. If more space is needed, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.
D. As the survey relates to an ongoing source selection for the services identified in the cover letter, request that all information provided within the survey be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure.
E. The following description should be used as a guide in providing element ratings:
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NOTE: The adjectival ratings Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory reflect the ratings in the Contractor Performance Rating System (CPARS). However under the DOD’s streamlined process for evaluating Past Performance under Lowest Price Technically Acceptable, ratings of Acceptable and Unacceptable must be used. Therefore the Contracting Officer has determined that CPARS/Survey ratings of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, and Marginal will equate to an Acceptable rating. Rating of Unsatisfactory will equate to an Unacceptable rating.
Attachment II PPQ
SPE603-26-R-0514
Contractor Performance Assessment Input Form
Please assess the above contractor’s performance in the below areas. The narrative should include positive and negative statements to match the rating below each section.
1. Quality of Service: Assessment based on the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship to include ability to accommodate change. (I.e. Did the contractor exhibit knowledge of/ and comply with Government (or other) regulations? Did the contractor demonstrate technical expertise in providing all contractual services? Did the contractor utilize personnel or possess tools/equipment necessary to adequately provide the services? Was a Show Cause or Cure Notice or Discrepancy Report ever been issued? Was the contract terminated for default? Did the contractor display the ability to correct problems? Did the contractor meet the standards for Technical Performance/Administrative Performance/Safety & Health.)
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
2. Schedule: Assessment based on the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements to include responding to any correspondences. (I.e. were tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract? Was contractor responsive to technical and/or contractual direction? Was he compliant with contract terms and conditions? Were there any contract concessions/changes/terminations made due to the contractor's failure to accurately plan?)
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
Attachment II PPQ
3. Cost Control: Assessment should be based on the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, employ adequate budgetary internal controls. If the contract is Firm-Fixed Price or Firm- Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, please mark “Not Applicable”. (I.e. Did the contractor perform the effort within the estimated cost/price? Did contractor provide accurate and complete billings? Did the contractor submit accurate invoices on a timely basis? Demonstrate cost efficiencies in performing the required effort?)
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
4. Management of Key Personnel: Assessment based on the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel. (I.e. Is the contractor managing subcontractors in order to meet the requirements of the contract? Did the contractor train personnel? Was the labor turnover in key personnel labor categories minimal? Did it adversely affect/or not the contractor’s performance? Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract who were clearly unqualified.)
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
Attachment II PPQ
5. Small Business: (This area applies only to domestic contracts.) Is the contractor in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract that are related to small business participation?. Is the contractor meeting small business goals? Is the contractor making a good faith effort to meet small business subcontracting goals?
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
6. Regulatory Compliance: Is the contractor in compliance with all regulations and codes regarding financial, environmental, labor, and safety. Is the contractor meeting the reporting requirements in a timely manner?
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
Attachment II PPQ
7. Business Relationships: Has the contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed?
Maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or CO/CS is apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues? Did the contractor present information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner? Did the contractor promptly notify the COR/CS/CO in a timely manner regarding urgent issues? What do you think of the contractor’s overall performance?
Please rate the above contractor substantiated by the above narration, according to the following ratings:
____ Exceptional ____ Very Good ____Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ____Not Applicable
Attachment II PPQ
| Contract Type |
| Performed as: |
| Complexity of Work |
Contract Dates
| Text1: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Text7: |
| Text8: |
| Date9_af_date: |
| Date10_af_date: |
| Date11_af_date: |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Text18: |
| Text19: |
| Text20: |
| Text21: |
| Text22: |
| Date23_af_date: |
| Text24: |
| Text25: |
| Text26: |
| Text27: |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Text34: |
| Text35: |
| Text36: |
| Text37: |
| Check Box38: Off |
| Check Box39: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box42: Off |
| Check Box43: Off |
| Text44: |
| Text45: |
| Text46: |
| Text47: |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Text54: |
| Text55: |
| Text56: |
| Text57: |
| Check Box58: Off |
| Check Box59: Off |
| Check Box60: Off |
| Check Box61: Off |
| Check Box62: Off |
| Check Box63: Off |
| Text64: |
| Text65: |
| Text66: |
| Text67: |
| Check Box68: Off |
| Check Box69: Off |
| Check Box70: Off |
| Check Box71: Off |
| Check Box72: Off |
| Check Box73: Off |
| Text74: |
| Text75: |
| Text76: |
| Text77: |
| Check Box78: Off |
| Check Box79: Off |
| Check Box80: Off |
| Check Box81: Off |
| Check Box82: Off |
| Check Box83: Off |
| Text84: |
| Text85: |
| Text86: |
| Text87: |
| Check Box88: Off |
| Check Box89: Off |
| Check Box90: Off |
| Check Box91: Off |
| Check Box92: Off |
| Check Box93: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .