Attachment7_PastPerformanceQuestionaire.doc
DOC document 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12034320R4001
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for construction services for Phase 3 of the Crooked River Valley Rehabilitation Project on the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests in Idaho. The scope of work includes constructing approximately 4300 linear feet of large wood structures, 2800 linear feet of brush fascine Type 1, and 900 linear feet of brush fascine Type 2, up to 32 acres of floodplain roughness, and planting approximately 12,000 riparian plants. The contractor will be responsible for coordinating delivery of the government-furnished plants from the supplier to the project site, and providing proper on-site storage and care of the plants. The estimated value of the contract is between $500,000 and $1,000,000. The period of performance is from approximately June 20, 2020 to October 15, 2020. Proposals must be submitted electronically to the specified email address by the deadline stated in the solicitation. The Department of Agriculture Forest Service is the contracting agency for this project, which is being performed in collaboration with the Nez Perce Tribe Watershed Program and funded by Bonneville Power Administration and Forest Service stewardship funds.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend1.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment6_AerialPhotos.pdf | ||
| AttachmentJ3_PlantingPlan.pdf | ||
| AttachmentJ5_SWPPPTemplate.docx | DOCX document | |
| AttachmentJ2_CrookedRiverPhase 3_DrawingsSigned.pdf | ||
| AttachmentJ4_TechnicalSpecifications.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_including_AttachmentJ1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation 12034320R4001
Crooked River Valley Rehabilitation Phase 3
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests
ATTACHMENT J-7: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Project/Contract: __________________ Name of Offeror: __________________________________ Name and Title of Person Completing Questionnaire:________________________________________ Reference Contact Information (phone # & email address):___________________________________ Company/Organization: __________________________________ Briefly describe the nature and size in dollars of your contract with the Offeror and types of work completed. (If more space is needed, please use the “Additional Comments” block on the second page):
Please return this Past Performance Questionnaire to Karen Ruklic at the following email address: karen.ruklic@usda.gov no later than the date offers are due. For questions call 208-983-5144.
ADJECTIVAL RATING DEFINITIONS
| “E” |
| Excellent: Performance greatly exceeded contract requirements resulting in overall benefits to the customer with no significant weaknesses or complaints. |
| “G” |
| Good: Performance consistently met and often exceeded many of the contract requirements with very few weaknesses or complaints. |
| “A” |
| Acceptable: Performance consistently met contract requirements with noted weaknesses or complaints adequately corrected. |
| “M” |
| Marginal: Performance often failed to meet minimum contract requirements with numerous noted weaknesses or complaints usually corrected. |
| “U” |
| Unacceptable: Performance consistently failed to meet contract requirements with numerous significant weaknesses or complaints left uncorrected. |
| Past Performance Question |
| Rating (Circle answer) |
1. Describe the quality of work performed. Did the contractor meet or exceed contract requirements?
Comments:
E G A M U
2. Describe the timeliness of performance.
Comments:
E G A M U
3. Rate the quality of contract management including paperwork processing and quality control effectiveness. How responsive was the contractor in resolving quality, schedule, or other contract issues?
Comments:
E G A M U
4. How effective was the contractor in addressing specific customer needs including cost control, oversight of subcontractors/suppliers, and compliance with regulatory/labor/safety standards?
Comments:
E G A M U
5. How satisfied were you with the contractor’s overall performance?
E G A M U
6. Would you award another contract to this contractor?
Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
PLEASE NOTE: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations, contractors may be advised of adverse remarks and given an opportunity to respond. However, the contracting officer will not provide your name or copies of this questionnaire to the contractor or any other party not directly involved in the evaluation of the contractor’s proposal.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .