Attachment M-1_ORC Relevancy Matrix.pdf

FA8903-23-R-0032

McConnell Air Force Base (AFB) Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC)

Past Performance Relevancy Matrix

*Higher relevance may be assessed for projects greater than $20,000,000.

1. Program Management and Quality Assurance

Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 4 or more of the 5 criteria below.

Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2-3 out of the 5 criteria below.

Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 1 out of the 5 criteria below.

Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, no Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in any of the 5 criteria below.

A. Experience providing quality documents including preparing and amending records of decision, explanations of significant difference, feasibility studies, conceptual site models, technical plans, and reports that were accurate, timely and complete. Met all regulatory schedule requirements as documented in project schedule and / or Project/Program Management Plan.

Deliverables accepted with no more than two rounds of technical comments from AF / Regulatory agency with only minor grammatical or formatting edits.

B. Experience performing site work in compliance with required and applicable regulations (e.g., health and safety, ARARs, environmental, OSHA, state, federal, professional certifications and registrations requirements). Site work resulted in zero fines or Notices of Violation.

C. Experience implementing RCRA processes and / or CERCLA processes IAW regulation and protective of Human Health and the Environment (an "exceptional or very good" represents completion of combined actions / interrelated pieces of the entire the RCRA and / or CERCLA process).

D. Experience developing and maintaining project management plan and schedule that details required actions and performance objectives across multiple sites.

E. Experience performing an effort that required work on multiple remediation disciplines with more than (5) five sites on installations or former installations (able to coordinate work on multiple sites and areas well).

Past Performance Relevancy Matrix

2. Regulatory Interaction and Stakeholder Coordination

Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 5 or more of the 6 criteria below.

Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 3-4 out of the 6 criteria below.

Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2 out of the 6 criteria below.

Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in less than 2 out of the 6 criteria below.

A. Experience working proactively and collaboratively in support of the Government to achieve timely regulatory agreement/approval of project goals (e.g., performance objectives, reduced Life Cycle Costs, modification of remedies and decision documents).

B. Experience working with relevant state regulatory processes IAW regulation and protectiveness of human health and the environment.

C. Experience implementing and / or facilitating Community Involvement, addressing challenging stakeholders and / or collaborating with community stakeholders in such instances as public events, meetings and during work related to Site Closeout (Corrective Action Complete public meetings), Restoration Advisory Boards, and / or additional outreach.

D. Experience coordinating with Government stakeholders to successfully transition work to incoming contractor, providing all the required technical and programmatic files and documents (such as GIS, mapping, sampling data, records, and plans) to coordinate contract closeout and assist the incoming contractor to successfully assume all site responsibilities within contractual timeframe.

E. Experience managing environmental restoration activities on property with multiple owners / stakeholders (e.g., local redevelopment authorities, private entities, federal agencies, and municipalities) while maintaining schedules and achieving performance objectives.

F. Responded to government and stakeholder questions in a timely manner.

Past Performance Relevancy Matrix

3. Analysis and Data Management

Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 4 out of the 5 criteria below.

Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 3 out of the 5 criteria below.

Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2 out of the 5 criteria below.

Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in less than 2 out of the 5 criteria below.

A. Experience managing, reviewing, and analyzing large quantities of data and preparing reports (such as, work plans and conceptual site models) that are used to support site decisions and effectively communicate site status, issues, performance against metrics, and recommendations.

B. Experience managing and reviewing data for reporting of human health, ecological, and other risk assessments as required, conducted IAW state and EPA risk assessment guidance.

C. Experience in using site data to identify, obtain approval, and implement an innovative approach that results in accelerated site closeout or reduced long term cost.

D. Experience in assessing, analyzing, and validating data to assure the data are of sufficient quality/integrity to support site decisions.

E. Experience designing, installing, operating, maintaining, and / or optimizing remediation systems, such as a pump and treat system, in a manner that ensures appropriate maintenance of the selected remedy and usability of data to establish remedy performance thresholds and ability to recognize when system(s) is not operating properly or anticipate a system failure.