Attachment L - Reference Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 113 KB Posted

Attached to
Operation and Management of Contractor-Operated Correctional Facilities – Graceville CF
Solicitation number
ITN-12216
Issued by
Jackson County, Gulf Breeze City, Florida

About this file

The document is a Reference Questionnaire (Attachment L) for Florida Department of Corrections (FDC) Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) Number FDC-ITN-25-070 for the Operation and Management of Contractor-Operated Correctional Facilities. The form is designed to be completed by a previous client/reference of a vendor bidding on the correctional facilities contract, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the vendor's past performance.

The questionnaire comprises 12 scored questions that assess various aspects of the vendor's performance, including contract implementation, deadline adherence, reporting accuracy, staff quality, customer service, contract management, and overall cooperation. Each question is assigned a specific point value, with maximum scores ranging from 0-8 points per question, totaling a potential maximum score of 64 points. The scoring methodology allows references to provide detailed feedback on the vendor's past performance, covering areas such as milestone compliance, invoice accuracy, staff competence, and willingness to work with the vendor again.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FORM 1 - Contact Information.pdf PDF
FORM 12 - REPLY BOND FORM REVISED.docx DOCX document
ITN-25-070 Contractor Operated CF Graceville.pdf PDF
FORM 7 - Pass Fail Requirement Certification and Non-Collusion Certification.pdf PDF
FORM 12 - REPLY BOND FORM.docx DOCX document
FORM 8 - PUR1355 Foreign Country of Concern Attestation.docx DOCX document
Attachment G - December 2024 Alphabetical State Drug Formulary.pdf PDF
Attachment A Draft Graceville OM Contract Revised Final.pdf PDF
FORM 6 - Mandatory Responsiveness Requiements.pdf PDF
FORM 5 - Subcontracting.pdf PDF
FORM 4 - Business Experience.pdf PDF
FORM 2 - Notice of Conflict of Interest.pdf PDF
Attachment B Inventory - Graceville - Feb 2025.pdf PDF
Attachment A Draft Graceville OM Contract Final.pdf PDF
Attachment M - Business Associate Agreement for HIPPA.docx DOCX document
FORM 11 - DRUG FREE WORKPLACE.pdf PDF
Attachment F - 2024-2025 4-Week Master Menu Spreadsheets 10.1 Final.pdf PDF
FORM 9 - PUR 7801 (Vendor Certification Form).docx DOCX document
FORM 10 - pur 2024 use of coercion forced labor combined final.docx DOCX document
FORM 3 - Statement of No involvement.pdf PDF
Exhibit J - Transition Schedule Requirements - Graceville.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Current Facility Program Plan - Graceville.pdf PDF
Attachment J - Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement.pdf PDF
Attachment C Price Sheet - Graceville.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment E - Operating Per Diem.pdf PDF
Exhibit I - Transition Plan Requirements - Graceville.pdf PDF
Exhibit K - Quarterly Performance Measures and Deliverables - Graceville.xls XLS spreadsheet
Exhibit M - 2026-27FY IWTF Program Request and Budget Narrative Request Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment E - Public Per Diem.pdf PDF
FDC ITB-25-070 Addendum 1 QA Final.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT L

REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FDC-ITN-25-070

Operation and Management of Contractor-Operated Correctional Facilities

This form will be completed by the Department utilizing the information provided on Form 4, Business Experience.

Vendor’s Name:

Reference’s Name:

Primary Contact Person: Alternate Contact Person:

Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone Number:

The following questions will be asked of each reference. Score

1. Briefly describe the services the Vendor performed for your organization: N/A

2. How would you rate the contract implementation with this Vendor? Excellent = 8, Good = 6, Acceptable = 4, Fair = 2, Poor = 0

3. Did the Vendor consistently meet all of its performance/milestone deadlines? Yes = 4, No = 0

4. Did the Vendor submit reports and invoices that were timely and accurate? Yes = 4, No = 0

5. Did you impose sanctions, penalties, liquidated damages, or financial consequences on the Vendor during the last 12 months? Yes = 0, No = 4

6. How would you rate the Vendor’s key staff and their ability to work with your organization? Excellent = 8, Good = 6, Acceptable = 4, Fair = 2, Poor = 0

7. Did you ever request dismissal of any key staff? Yes = 0, No = 4

8. Did the Vendor’s project/Contract Manager effectively manage the contract? Yes = 4

No = 0

9. How would you rate the Vendor’s customer service? Excellent = 8, Good = 6, Acceptable = 4, Fair = 2, Poor = 0

10. Was the Vendor’s staff knowledgeable about the contract requirements and scope of services? Yes = 4, No = 0

11. Did the Vendor work cooperatively with the organization during the course of the contract? Yes = 4, No = 0

12. Would you contract with this Vendor again? Yes = 8, No = 0

Total Score:

Reference Verified by:

Name (printed) Title

Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .