Attachment L - Reference Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 113 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- ITN-12216
- Issued by
- Jackson County, Gulf Breeze City, Florida
About this file
The document is a Reference Questionnaire (Attachment L) for Florida Department of Corrections (FDC) Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) Number FDC-ITN-25-070 for the Operation and Management of Contractor-Operated Correctional Facilities. The form is designed to be completed by a previous client/reference of a vendor bidding on the correctional facilities contract, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the vendor's past performance.
The questionnaire comprises 12 scored questions that assess various aspects of the vendor's performance, including contract implementation, deadline adherence, reporting accuracy, staff quality, customer service, contract management, and overall cooperation. Each question is assigned a specific point value, with maximum scores ranging from 0-8 points per question, totaling a potential maximum score of 64 points. The scoring methodology allows references to provide detailed feedback on the vendor's past performance, covering areas such as milestone compliance, invoice accuracy, staff competence, and willingness to work with the vendor again.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT L
REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FDC-ITN-25-070
Operation and Management of Contractor-Operated Correctional Facilities
This form will be completed by the Department utilizing the information provided on Form 4, Business Experience.
Vendor’s Name:
Reference’s Name:
Primary Contact Person: Alternate Contact Person:
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone Number:
The following questions will be asked of each reference. Score
1. Briefly describe the services the Vendor performed for your organization: N/A
2. How would you rate the contract implementation with this Vendor? Excellent = 8, Good = 6, Acceptable = 4, Fair = 2, Poor = 0
3. Did the Vendor consistently meet all of its performance/milestone deadlines? Yes = 4, No = 0
4. Did the Vendor submit reports and invoices that were timely and accurate? Yes = 4, No = 0
5. Did you impose sanctions, penalties, liquidated damages, or financial consequences on the Vendor during the last 12 months? Yes = 0, No = 4
6. How would you rate the Vendor’s key staff and their ability to work with your organization? Excellent = 8, Good = 6, Acceptable = 4, Fair = 2, Poor = 0
7. Did you ever request dismissal of any key staff? Yes = 0, No = 4
8. Did the Vendor’s project/Contract Manager effectively manage the contract? Yes = 4
No = 0
9. How would you rate the Vendor’s customer service? Excellent = 8, Good = 6, Acceptable = 4, Fair = 2, Poor = 0
10. Was the Vendor’s staff knowledgeable about the contract requirements and scope of services? Yes = 4, No = 0
11. Did the Vendor work cooperatively with the organization during the course of the contract? Yes = 4, No = 0
12. Would you contract with this Vendor again? Yes = 8, No = 0
Total Score:
Reference Verified by:
Name (printed) Title
Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .