ATTACHMENT J.5 PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY.doc
DOC document 60 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM21R0009
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for federal contractors. The survey includes a section for the offeror to provide details of prior work and a section for the government client to rate performance across 11 criteria. Ratings are on a scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree. Government clients are asked to provide any additional comments and sign and date the completed survey. This type of past performance survey is used by federal agencies to evaluate offerors' prior relevant experience during the source selection process for new contract awards.
This solicitation is seeking proposals for unclassified construction security monitoring services at various overseas State Department facilities. Contractors will provide cleared American guard and construction surveillance technicians to control access, deter unauthorized materials, and surveil uncleared workers during overseas construction projects. The requirement includes implementation of site security personnel to support operations. The solicitation will be available electronically on SAM.gov. The NAICS code is 561612 and small business size standard is $22 million. Proposals are due by the closing date. The Department of State intends to award up to three IDIQ contracts, with one set aside for small business. Active SAM registration is required for offerors to be eligible for consideration.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19AQMM21R0009 0006.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT J.4 Pricing DocumentREV3.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 19AQMM21R0009 0005.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT J.4 Pricing DocumentREV2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT J.13 Small Business Plan Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM21R0009 0004.pdf | ||
| DSTC SCHEDULE.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM21R0009 0003.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM21R0009 0002.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM21R0009 0001.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT J.2 PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY.doc | DOC document | |
| ATTACHMENT J.1 DD 254, Contract Security Classification Specification.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM21R0009.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT J.4 Pricing Document.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J2
RFP#
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Offeror shall complete the requested information within Section 1 of this form only. After completing Section 1, please forward this form to your Government Representative or Client to complete Section 2.. Please instruct them to forward this form back to you the offeror, this form is to be included in you proposal. If you have any questions, please email Keith Westry at Westryk@state.gov and Michael Skufca at SkufcaMJ@state.gov. .
Section 1:
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
Name of OFFEROR: ______________________ Project name and contract/task order number:
Brief description of Statement of Work or support provided:
Number of contractor personnel assigned to the project/contract/task order:
Total period of performance (dates):____________________ to _______________________
Total Cost/Price:
Did you inform your client this past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to you by April 28, 2021?
FORMCHECKBOX
Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
SECTION 2:
TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE or CLIENT. and returned directly to the offeror.
Client’s Organization: ______________________________ Address of Organization: ____________________________ Name and Title of Client or Government Representative Technical Point of Contact (POC): ________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________ Will the Government Representative’s listed above be willing to address the responses to this questionnaire if contacted?
FORMCHECKBOX
Yes FORMCHECKBOX No Please check the box that best describes the rating that best meets the statement of each category below:
1. The Overall Technical Performance met the minimal contract requirements
FORMCHECKBOX
*Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX *Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX Agree FORMCHECKBOX Strongly Agree
*If you checked Strongly Disagree or Disagree, please provide a statement on the additional page provided.
2. The quality of work to include the professionalism of Key personnel hired met the minimal contract requirements.
FORMCHECKBOX
*Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX *Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX Agree FORMCHECKBOX Strongly Agree
*If you checked Strongly Disagree or Disagree, please provide a statement on the additional page provided.
3. The anticipated performance schedule was adhered to, or was accomplished within an acceptable timeframe.
FORMCHECKBOX
Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX
*Strongly Agree
*If you checked Strongly Agree, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provided.
4. Both cost performance was in line with the original proposal and invoices were accurate.
FORMCHECKBOX
Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX
*If you checked Strongly Agree, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provided.
5. The contractor complied with the terms of the contract and/or task orders issued.
FORMCHECKBOX
Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX
*If you checked Strongly Agree, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provided.
6. The contractor was flexible and amenable during times of change or during difficult situations which required ‘on-the-fly’ adjustments to normal procedures.
FORMCHECKBOX
Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX
*If you checked Strongly Agree, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provided
7. The contractor’s turnover (key or field personnel) was higher than expected throughout the period of performance.
FORMCHECKBOX
Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX
*If you checked Strongly Agree, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provided
8. For any reason; did the contractor have any work terminated (convenience/default)?
FORMCHECKBOX
No FORMCHECKBOX *Yes
*If you checked YES, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provided.
9. The contractor’s Management Team was efficient and proactive; requiring little to no supervision from their superiors or assistance from the Client to accomplish the respective tasks.
FORMCHECKBOX
Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Disagree FORMCHECKBOX Neutral FORMCHECKBOX
*If you checked Strongly Agree, please provide a supporting statement on the additional page provide
10. I would select this contractor to work on contracts that:
(Select all that apply)
FORMCHECKBOX
Are Fast Paced, FORMCHECKBOX
Require Streamlined Processes, FORMCHECKBOX
Require Constant Overseas Logistics and Planning, FORMCHECKBOX
Require short suspense to requests and requirements.
FORMCHECKBOX
Require timely and accurate invoicing
11. Please provide any additional information you believe will assist the evaluation panel with making a more informed decision.
SIGNATURE: __________________________________ DATE:______________________________
SUPPORTING STATEMENTS
1. The Overall Technical Performance met the minimal contract requirements
FORMCHECKBOX
*Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX *Disagree
2. The quality of work to include the professionalism of personnel hired met the minimal contract requirments.
FORMCHECKBOX
*Strongly Disagree FORMCHECKBOX *Disagree
3. The anticipated performance schedule was adhered to, or was accomplished within an acceptable timeframe.
FORMCHECKBOX
*Strongly Agree
4. Both cost performance was in line with the original proposal and invoices were accurate. FORMCHECKBOX
5. The contractor complied with the terms of the contract and/or task orders issued. FORMCHECKBOX *Strongly Agree
6. The contractor was flexible and amenable during times of change or during difficult situations which required ‘on-the-fly’ adjustments to normal procedures. FORMCHECKBOX *Strongly Agree
7. The contractor’s turnover was higher than expected throughout the period of performance. FORMCHECKBOX
8. Did the contractor have any part of work terminated for any reason (convenience/default)? FORMCHECKBOX *Yes
9. The contractor’s Management Team was efficient and proactive; requiring little to no assistance to accomplish tasks issued by the Client. FORMCHECKBOX
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .