Attachment J.4 - Past Performance Questionnaire (693JJ926R000067).docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) Updates
- Solicitation number
- 693JJ926R000067
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for solicitation 693JJ926R000067, the Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) and Countermeasures At Work (CMAW) Guide Updates opportunity issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under the Department of Transportation. The questionnaire is designed to be completed by references familiar with the offeror's relevant work, with a minimum of three (3) references required to submit responses directly to the Contract Specialist, Van A. Nixon, Jr., at NHTSAOAM@dot.gov by the proposal due date.
The questionnaire evaluates contractor performance across eight key elements using a five-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable): quality of technical work and deliverables, ability to conduct and synthesize large-scale literature reviews, technical and scientific report writing quality including APA style compliance, timeliness in meeting milestones and deliverables, cost control and budget management, project management and staffing, responsiveness and communication with clients, and overall customer satisfaction. References must also provide a yes/no recommendation on whether they would award to the contractor again. The form includes sections for contractor and reference information, performance ratings in Part II, and narrative comments regarding the contractor's strengths, weaknesses, and overall performance in Part III, which requires a reference signature and date.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 693JJ926R000067_CMTW_RFP 10-28.pdf | ||
| Vendor Questions Matrix (693JJ926R000067) - CMTW_CW (1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 693JJ926R000067_CMTW_RFP 10-28.pdf | ||
| Vendor Questions Matrix (693JJ926R000067) - CMTW.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 693JJ926R000067_CMTW_RFP 10-5.pdf | ||
| 693JJ926R000067_CMTW_RFP 10-5.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.5 - Subcontractor Checklist (693JJ926R000067).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment J.2 - Travel Cost Breakdown (693JJ926R000067).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J.1 - Cost Proposal Template (CPFF) (693JJ926R000067).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J.3 - Other Direct Cost Breakdown (693JJ926R000067).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 693JJ926R000067_CMTW_RFP.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT J.3 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation No. 693JJ926R000067 - Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) Update INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror shall provide this questionnaire to at least three (3) references familiar with the Offeror's relevant work. References shall complete Parts I-III and submit the questionnaire directly to Van A. Nixon, Jr., Contract Specialist, at NHTSAOAM@dot.gov, no later than the proposal due date.
PART I - CONTRACTOR AND REFERENCE INFORMATION
Offeror (Contractor) Name
Contract / Project Title
Contract Number
Period of Performance
Total Contract Value
Reference Name and Title
Reference Organization
Reference Phone
Reference Email
Nature of Services Provided
PART II - PERFORMANCE RATINGS
Rate the contractor on each element using the scale: E = Exceptional, VG = Very Good, S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N/A = Not Applicable.
| Performance Element |
| Rating |
Quality of technical work and deliverables
Ability to conduct and synthesize large-scale literature reviews
Technical/scientific report writing quality (including APA style)
Timeliness in meeting milestones and deliverables
Cost control and budget management
Project management and staffing
Responsiveness and communication with the client
Overall customer satisfaction
Would you award to this contractor again? (Yes/No)
PART III - NARRATIVE AND SIGNATURE
Please provide any narrative comments regarding the contractor's strengths, weaknesses, and overall performance:
Reference Signature: ______________________________ Date: ________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .