Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 48 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TTP printed sleeves and inserts
- Solicitation number
- 040ADV-25-R-0046
- Issued by
-
Government Publishing Office
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) to evaluate contractor performance on previous federal contracts.
The questionnaire is completed in two parts: contractors provide contract information including contract number, date, period of performance, place of performance, contract value, and a description of the project's key characteristics; evaluating organization representatives then assess the contractor's performance across nine evaluation criteria using a six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Observed). The evaluation criteria include quality of products and services, overall performance, schedule adherence, technical requirements fulfillment, cost control, subcontracting compliance, customer satisfaction in routine matters, customer satisfaction during unexpected difficulties, and likelihood of repeat business. The form also requires evaluators to document the contractor's weak and strong points, identify other completed projects, and report average award fee percentages if applicable. Completed questionnaires are designated as source selection sensitive information and must be protected accordingly. Inquiries regarding the questionnaire should be directed to Nataliya Holl or Paige Menard at the GPO's Agency Acquisitions office located at 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire
ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
U.S. Government Publishing Office Agency Acquisitions 732 North Capitol Street, NW Room A530, Stop: AS Washington, DC 20401
Email: Nataliya Holl at nholl@gpo.gov and Paige Menard at pmenard@gpo.gov
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS:
3. CONTRACT NO.:
4. CONTRACT DATE:
5. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
6. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:
7. COMPLETION DATE:
8. CONTRACT $ VALUE:
2. PROJECT NAME:
9. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:
Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
11. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:
EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)
EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER
MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
| Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor: | ||
| EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good | S = Satisfactory | MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed |
| Quality of Products and Services - Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Overall Performance - Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Schedule - Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate). | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Technical Requirements - Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Cost Control - Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Subcontracting - Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Customer Satisfaction - Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Customer Satisfaction - Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
| Repeat Business - Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future. | |||||
| |_|EX | |_|VG | |_|S | |_|MG | |_|US | |_|N/O |
List Contractor’s Weak Points:
List Contractor’s Strong Points:
List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:
If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .