Attachment J-2 - Brand Name Justification.pdf
PDF 507 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HD Video Cameras
- Solicitation number
- 030ADV25Q0174
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This Justification and Approval (J&A) document supports a sole-source contract for the Library of Congress Multimedia Group (MMG) to procure Sony camera kits. The Library requires contract support to replace its existing fleet of Sony HD cameras with new Sony camera models, specifically the Sony FX6 and Sony Burano, to maintain manufacturer consistency and workflow compatibility. The procurement includes camera kits ranging from Sony HD, Sony 4K, and Sony Cinematic cameras, along with associated accessories like lenses, memory cards, lens mounts, and tripods.
The contract is for a period of performance from 09/30/2025 to 01/30/2026, with Sony as the sole contractor. The justification for sole-source procurement is based on the Library's need for consistent infrastructure, proprietary hardware and software, and the requirement to use Sony cameras that are cross-compatible with the current fleet. The total contract value is not explicitly stated, but the document indicates the procurement is over the $250,000 threshold. The Library plans to post the brand name justification on SAM.gov and will evaluate pricing fairness prior to contract award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment J-3 - Questions and Answers - UPDATED.pdf | ||
| 030ADV25Q0174 0002.pdf | ||
| 030ADV25Q0174 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-3 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 030ADV25Q0174.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-1 - Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Justification and Approval For Other than Full and Open Competition
Requisition Number: 2025-LBN-0072
Form Updated 5/9/2018
Part 2 – Program Office Justification & Approval
4. Authority for Contracting Without Competition
Over $250,000 For this requirement over $250,000, under FAR part 6, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
There is only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy Library requirements.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C); FAR 6.302-1.
Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. FAR 6.302-1(b)(1).
Source controls copyrights, patents, raw materials, or secret processes cannot be acquired otherwise, or similar circumstances. FAR 6.302-
1(b)(2).
Other exception identified in FAR 6.302-1: Identify the exception
There is such unusual & compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured if competition is not limited.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B); FAR 6.302-2. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute (e.g., AbilityOne, UNICOR, GPO, GSA Public Buildings Service, Appropriations Act, etc.) per 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 6.302-5: Identify the authority
Other basis authorized in 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b) or FAR part 6.302: Identify the exception
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. FAR 6.302-1(c).
The Product is listed on the Library’s Technical Reference Model (TRM) as part of the “As-is” Lifecycle, Page #: (Attach applicable page from TRM)
Up to $250,000 For this requirement up to $250,000, using simplified acquisition procedures under FAR part 13, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
Only one responsible source is reasonably available to meet Library requirements. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b); FAR 13.106-1.
Product or service is reasonably available from only one source.
Source controls copyrights, patents or other exclusive licensing arrangements.
Urgent circumstances; only one source can reasonably deliver by required date. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute: Identify the authority
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product
The Product is listed on the Library’s Technical Reference Model as part of the “As-is” Lifecycle, Page #: (Attach applicable page from
TRM)
GSA Schedule Order For this GSA schedule order under FAR part 8, the basis for not competing among GSA schedule-holders and/or specifying a brand name product or item is:
An urgent and compelling need exists, and following GSA procedures would result in unacceptable delays.
FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A).
Only one GSA source is capable of fulfilling the requirement at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B).
In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original order that was placed competitively among GSA schedule-holders (i.e., the original order was not sole-source or limited-source.) FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C).
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product
The Product is listed on the Library’s Technical Reference Model as part of the “As-is” Lifecycle, Page #: (Attach
Order Under Multiple Award Indefinite-Delivery Contract or GWAC For this order under FAR subpart 16.5, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
The need is so urgent fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR
16.505(b)(2)(i)(B).
A logical follow-on order in the interest of economy and efficiency. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(C).
To satisfy a minimum guarantee. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(D).
Authorized or required by statute. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(E).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. 41
U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B) and FAR 16.505(a)(4)(i).
The Product is listed on the Library’s Technical Reference Model as part of the “As-is” Lifecycle, Page #: (Attach applicable page from the
TRM)
Justification and Approval For Other than Full and Open Competition
Requisition Number: 2025-LBN-0072
Form Updated 5/9/2018
Part 3 – Contracting Officer Determinations & Certification
8. Efforts to Solicit from As Many Potential Sources As Practicable Unless a justification is based on FAR 06.302-2, Unusual and compelling urgency, contracting officers shall post justifications for other than full and open competition, including brand name justifications, to SAM.gov (or eBuy for Brand Name Justifications under FAR Part 8) prior to requesting a proposal or otherwise entering into negotiations.
Advance notice will be published on SAM.gov for 15 days before a contract is awarded. FAR 5.203(a).
Advance or concurrent notice will be published on SAM.gov for a reasonable time for commercial items FAR 5.203(a) and 12.204(b).
Advance notice will not be published because the action meets the following FAR exception:
Notice would compromise national security. FAR 5.202(a)(1).
Unusual and compelling urgency; notice period would seriously injure Government. FAR 5.202(a)(2).
Expressly authorized or required to be made through another Government agency. FAR 5.202(a)(4).
Order will be placed against an IDIQ contract awarded under FAR 16.5. FAR 5.202(a)(6).
Order will be placed against GSA schedule or other competitively-awarded contract. FAR 5.202(a)(11).
Other:
Advance notice will not be published per 41 U.S.C. § 6101; see attached deviation from the FAR per LCR 2110 § 3.A.
We made the following efforts to interest potential sources in this award: Brand Name Justification will be posted to SAM.gov alongside the solicitation.
9. Listing of Sources That Expressed Interest in Writing
The following sources expressed interest in this award: TBD.
10. Additional Information
The following additional information is relevant to this justification and approval: None.
11. Contracting Officer Determination that Price Is Fair and Reasonable As explained in detail below, I have determined that the prices for this contracting action are fair and reasonable based on comparison of the prices to the following (see FAR 15.404-1(b)(2):
Historical prices paid by the Government Published competitive price lists
Library’s Independent Government Estimate Prices obtained through market research
Other: Prices obtained through competitive proposals
The following analysis (based on attached pricing information) supports my determination: Fair and reasonable pricing will be determined prior to award.
12. Contracting Officer Determination of Responsibility Checked System for Award Management (or will check in the case of competitive proposals for a brand name product)
13. Contracting Officer Determination of Best Value I have determined that this action represents the best value to the Government because: Best value will be determined prior to contract award.
14. Contracting Officer Certification I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this justification is accurate and complete.
___________Brian D. Curl______________
Name
Signature
Date
05/29/2025
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .