Attachment J-14 Quarterly Self Assessment 3.9.20.pdf
PDF 737 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HQ0858-20-R-0014
- Issued by
-
DOD Missile Defense Agency
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for Missile Defense Systems Engineering services. The Missile Defense Agency intends to award a cost-plus-fixed-fee level of effort contract for a base period of three years with two two-year options and a potential six-month extension. Services will be directed by the MDA Engineering Directorate and include research and development in physical, engineering, and life sciences to support MDS requirements. Proposals are due by November 6, 2020 and must be submitted electronically to the email addresses provided. The solicitation is available on beta.SAM.gov and offerors should routinely check for any amendments. Questions can be directed to the points of contact listed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HQ0858-20-R-0014
Attachment J-09 Monthly Status Report
Quarterly Self-Assessment Report (QSR) Format
A current, fact-based self-assessment will include identification of accomplishments, risks encountered and how they were mitigated, and deficiencies in any aspect of contract performance. It will include any corrective actions required, whether or not they were successful, and proactive measures taken to prevent the recurrence of similar situations.
The Contractor may devise its own format for the QSR as long as the report addresses all of the applicable considerations for each of the Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) factors. Once the initial report is received, the Contracting Officer’s Representative may advise the Contractor of needed improvements to the format of the report.
CPAR Factors: Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Utilization and
Regulatory Compliance
Contractor’s Presumptive Rating: List the rating that the Contractor has earned IAW with the Quality
Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) and the Guidance for the CPARS available on CPARS.gov.
Identified Weaknesses or Required Corrective Actions: Explain any weaknesses in performance, any corrective actions employed to mitigate the weakness encountered, and the successfulness of the corrective action in resolving the weakness.
Requirement(s) Exceeded: Explain what independent effort was performed that exceeded the
Government’s requirement. Reference the PWS paragraph or other contractual area that was exceeded. Ensure that the subfactors shown in the QASP are addressed.
Benefit to the Government: Explain how the Government benefitted from the exceeded requirement.
Identify the event(s) IAW Enclosure One to the QASP.
Approved for Public Release 20-MDA-10578 (18 Sep 20)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .