Attachment J-13 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 399 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS KANAWHA (T-AO 196) FY 21 MTA
Solicitation number
N32205-20-R-4008
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and information on a related federal contract opportunity for ship maintenance and repair services. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a contractor bidding on a U.S. Navy Military Sealift Command contract for mid-term availability services on the USNS Kanawha for fiscal year 2021. The contractor must return the completed questionnaire by September 24th. The questionnaire evaluates the contractor's performance on quality, timeliness, business relations, and staffing. The federal contract opportunity is solicitation number N32205-20-R-4008 for mid-term availability work on the USNS Kanawha to be awarded by the U.S. Navy Military Sealift Command.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N32205 -20-R-4008-0004.pdf PDF
J-3 Category B Items (REV A).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N32205-20-R-4008-0003.pdf PDF
USNS KANAWHA (T-AO 196) FY21 MTA Work Item Index (REV 3).docx DOCX document
J-2 Category A Items (REV 3).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N32205-20-R-4008-0002.pdf PDF
J-2 Category A Items (REV 2).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
USNS KANAWHA (T-AO 196) FY21 MTA Work Item Index (REV 2).docx DOCX document
J-2 Category A Items (REV 1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220520R4008-0001.pdf PDF
USNS KANAWHA (T-AO 196) FY21 MTA Work Item Index (REV 1).docx DOCX document
JA KANAWHA ROH 20R4008 (REDACTED).pdf PDF
USNS KANAWHA (T-AO 196) FY21 MTA Work Item Index.docx DOCX document
J-3 Category B Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J-9 Disclosure Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL).pdf PDF
Attachment J-10 Interport Differential.doc DOC document
J-2 Category A Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J-12 Past Performance Data.pdf PDF
Attachment J-8 Request for Clarification.pdf PDF
Attachment J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.pdf PDF
Attachment J-14 Technical Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).pdf PDF
Attachment J-4 GFP List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N32205-20-R-4008.pdf PDF
Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).zip ZIP file
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.

____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (24

September at 1400 hours, 2:00 PM EST) to Avonda S. Carter at avonda.carter@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, Avonda S.Carter

Contract Specialist mailto:avonda.carter@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the

Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service:

Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of

Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer

Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing

(Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes No Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .