Attachment III Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Dry Dock Repairs NOAA Ship Oscar Elton Sette
Solicitation number
1305M220QNMAN0149
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors on a solicitation for dry dock repairs of NOAA Ship Oscar Elton Sette. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors' past contracts and addresses quality of service, schedule, and management. Respondents are to provide adjectival ratings in these categories according to the definitions provided and additional comments. Completed questionnaires are due to the contract specialist Chris Meconnahey by July 9, 2020. The solicitation is for the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for dry dock repairs of a specific NOAA ship, with no further details provided in this template document.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Q and A 2 7-16.docx DOCX document
Attachment I SOW Rev1.pdf PDF
OS-800-004.pdf PDF
NOAA DOCKING REPORT.pdf PDF
Anchor Windlass and Capstan.pdf PDF
568-6233884.pdf PDF
Tunnel Thruster Ref-568-01 Model S300-L.pdf PDF
OS-140-001.pdf PDF
Image 1 WI 26.jpg JPG image
0606- Standards for Lifting Appliances on NOAA Ships (1) (1).doc DOC document
Q and A 1.docx DOCX document
Hydraulic Hose Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SE_529_529-6233835_RevG_Sht1-7_NONE_TA-529-6233835 BILGE And BALLAST SYS ARRGT.pdf PDF
0606-01 - Shipboard Lifting Appliance Certification and Inspections (1).doc DOC document
Image 2 WI 26.jpg JPG image
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
SE_529_529-6233819_RevG_Sht1-8_NONE_TA-529-6233819 BILGE AND BALLAST SYSTEM DIAGRAM.pdf PDF
OS-085-002 Revision A - Docking Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Price Schedule SE (Autosaved).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFQ 1305M220QNMAN0149 6-18.docx DOCX document
Reference Drawings 1.zip ZIP file
Attachment V - Deliverables List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Reference Drawings 3.zip ZIP file
Attachment II Past Performance Information Form.rtf RTF text file
Reference Drawings 5.zip ZIP file
Reference Drawings 2.zip ZIP file
Reference Drawings 6.zip ZIP file
Attachment VI - Subcontracting Plan Outline.doc DOC document
Reference Drawings 4.zip ZIP file
Attachment I SOW.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M220QNMAN0149 Attachment: III

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Chris Meconnahey no later than July 9, 2020 12:00 pm Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Chris Meconnahey, no later than July 9, 2020 12:00 pm Eastern Time:

Chris. Meconnahey@noaa.gov

Source Selection Information

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .