Attachment III-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M224QNMAN0313
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Request for Quotation (RFQ) 1305M224Q0313. The questionnaire is intended to evaluate the past performance of a contractor on a reference contract. It assesses the contractor's performance in four key areas: quality of service, schedule, cost control, and management. The evaluator is required to provide an adjectival rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) and comments for each area. The completed questionnaire should be sent to Michelle.Blake@noaa.gov by 4:00 PM Eastern on September 9, 2024.
The related federal contract opportunity is for FY 25 Intermediate Drydocking and Repairs to NOAA Ship Gordon Gunter, solicitation number 1305M224QNMAN0313. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a civilian agency within the Department of Commerce, is seeking quotes for this work. Interested vendors should request the Specification Reference Documents by emailing Michelle.Blake@noaa.gov and Andrew.Northcutt@noaa.gov.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment IV - Price Schedule (Rev. 1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment VI - DOL Employee Rights Jobsite Poster.pdf | ||
| COMBINED SYNOPSIS-SOLN.pdf | ||
| Attachment IV - Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment V - NOAA EAD AIRS PROCESS.pdf | ||
| Attachment II-Past Performance Information Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1-GU FY25 Drydock Rev (C).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
RFQ 1305M224Q0313
Name of Company Being Evaluated: _______________________________________
| REFERENCE CONTRACT #: | _____________________________________________ | |
| (the contract the evaluation is based on) |
Brief Title/Description of the Work: ______________________________________________
Evaluator’s Name:___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________
Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: __________________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Michelle.Blake@noaa.gov no later than 4:00 PM Eastern, September 9, 2024.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box. Please provide comments for ratings other than Satisfactory.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
Attachment III
Source Selection Information
Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost. (Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .