Attachment III Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY25 Reuben Lasker Intermediate Dry Docking Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1305M224Q0280A
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity. It requests an evaluator to assess the contractor's performance on a reference contract across three key areas: quality of service, schedule, and management. The evaluator is asked to provide an overall adjectival rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) and supporting comments for each evaluation area. The completed questionnaire is to be submitted to the Contract Specialist, Jim Van Natta, by August 23, 2024 at 2:00 PM EST.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the FY25 Intermediate Dry Docking of the NOAA Ship Reuben Lasker, as detailed in the attached Statement of Work. The solicitation number is 1305M224Q0280A, and the contract will be awarded by the Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Interested parties are instructed to contact the Contract Specialist, Jim Van Natta, for additional references.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1305M224Q0280 amd 0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_1305M224Q0280_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment I - Reuben Lasker FY 25 Dry Dock SOW Rev-1.6.pdf | ||
| Attachment VII - Reference - 256-01-00003-010 Rev_-_ Heat Exchanger.pdf | ||
| Lasker Bow Thruster Motor Rev 3.pdf | ||
| Attachment VIII - GEK 91694C Vertical Drilling Motor Type GEB20.pdf | ||
| Attachment IX - Reference - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM - REUBEN LASKER Stern Tube Leak Long Term Repair Plan REV A.pdf | ||
| 1305M224Q0280 Amendment 0001 SF 30 (11_2016).pdf | ||
| Attachment II Past Performance Information Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment I Reuben Lasker FY25 Dry Dock SOW Rev-1.5.pdf | ||
| 1305M224Q0280.pdf | ||
| Attachment VI - Deliverables List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment IV - Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| REFERENCE CONTRACT #: | _______________________________ | |
| (the contract the evaluation is based on) |
Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________
Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to jim.vannatta@noaa.gov no later than August 23, 2024 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time (EDT).
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Source Selection Information
Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to jim.vannatta@noaa.gov no later than August 23, 2024 2:00 PM EST.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .