Attachment H - Evaluation Matrix (EXAMPLE).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 129 KB Posted

Attached to
Sleep Apnea Testing Solution
Solicitation number
1183
Issued by
Denver County, Denver City, Colorado

About this file

The document is an Evaluation Matrix for a procurement process, specifically related to Denver Health and Hospital Authority, involving a Sleep Apnea Testing Solution contract opportunity in Colorado. The matrix outlines detailed selection criteria for contractor evaluation, which includes multiple weighted assessment categories such as ability to perform (30-15%), overall experience (10-5%), cost consciousness (20-10%), management plan (40-20%), interview performance (25%), and fee considerations (25%). The evaluation process involves a comprehensive scoring methodology using a 1-10 scale, with criteria spanning project performance, scheduling, workmanship, professionalism, budget adherence, and overall vendor reliability.

The evaluation framework includes specific performance rating sheets that enable detailed vendor assessment across multiple dimensions, including general qualifications, value-added services, scheduling capabilities, cost structures, and contractual agreement terms. Key evaluation components involve assessing whether vendors meet customer expectations, maintain project schedules, demonstrate quality workmanship, exhibit professional conduct, minimize construction disruptions, complete projects within budget, and provide appropriate value for pricing. The matrix provides a structured approach for ranking and comparing multiple vendors (up to five) based on weighted performance criteria, ultimately facilitating an objective selection process for the sleep apnea testing solution procurement.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PIPS Selection Criteria

PIP'S Selection Criteria
Contractor Selection
Past Performance & Management Plan CriteriaInterview & Final Selection Criteria
1) Ability to perform30%1) Ability to perform15%
2) Overall experience10%2) Past experience5.0%
3) Cost conscientious20%3) Cost conscientious10%
4) Management Plan40%4) Management Plan20%
100%5) Interview25%
6) Fee ($'s)25%
100%
Past Performance
1)Ability to perform4)Management Plan
Project meet customers expectations?Demonstrated ability to successfully complete project?
Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on time or early)?Current workload
Quality of workmanship?Proposed project schedule
Quality of materials?Qualifications of Key Personnel
Professionalism (actions & appearance of personnel)?Quality of Proposed Subcontractors
Was construction excessively disruptive?Knowledge of Project?
2)Overall ExperienceIdentified risks to addressed
Would you hire this firm again?Method of addressing risks
3)Cost conscientiousProposed methods of improving project?
Project completed within budget?Demonstrated similar projects?
Minimal change orders?
Was price appropriate to value received?5)Interview
Demonstrated similar projects?
Demonstrated familiarity with project?
Demonstrated qualifications of key personnel?
Demonstrated team concept with sub contractors?
Demonstrated knowledge of similar projects by sub-contractors?
Demonstrated ability to mitigate project risks?
Participation in project by firm's PM/Owner?
Proposed methods of improving project?
Comfort level with team leader?

Firm Performance Rating Sheet Performance Criteria Evaluation Data Sheet

INSTRUCTIONS - Please Complete The Following

1Fill in the EVALUATOR'S information.
2Verify to whom you are Evaluating is listed on Form.
3Scale each criteria 1 to 10, 10 being the best.
4Fax to:
Mr. Tom Sangster
Purchasing Director, Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Fax:303-436-3225
Phone:303-436-3298
RE: Performance Evaluation
Project Name, Project ###
Rate the Firm
EVALUATOR'S Name and CompanyPhone Number
Would not Hire AgainWould Definitely Hire Again
ItemPerformance Criteria12345678910
1Project meet customers expectations?10%
2Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on time or early)?10%
3Quality of workmanship?10%
4Quality of materials?10%
5Professionalism (actions & appearance of personnel)?10%
6Was construction excessively disruptive?10%
7Would you hire this firm again?10%
8Project completed within budget?10%
9Minimal change orders?10%
10Was price appropriate to value received?10%

Sum of Weights 100% 0

Name of Firm Being Rated

RFP Rating Sheet

RFP #

INSTRUCTIONS - Please Complete The Following

1Fill in the EVALUATOR'S information.
2Give ratings only for the areas listed. 1-100 rating, 100 being the best.
3Enter rating in white column to the left of the gray column for each category.
4Each line will calculate based upon the weight percentage listed.
5Rank Order Firms

EVALUATOR'S Name:

VENDOR #1VENDOR #2VENDOR #3VENDOR #4VENDOR #5 -
WeightItemRating Criterion
5%1General Information/Qualifications00000
20%2Value Added00000
30%3Scheduling00000
35%4Costs00000
10%5Contractual Agreement00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
100%TOTAL00000
00000

Rank Order

NOTES

VENDOR #1

VENDOR #2

VENDOR #3

VENDOR #4

image1.jpeg image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .