Attachment G - .pdf
PDF 853 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LAS/PBS Data Application Migration
- Solicitation number
- RFP-01486
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This document is the Attachment G - Technical Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria for a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Executive Office of the Governor (EOG), Systems Design and Development, for the data application migration of the Legislative Appropriations System/Planning and Budgeting Subsystem (LAS/PBS). The RFP outlines the evaluation criteria and scoring for the technical response, which includes assessments of the respondent's key personnel, management plan, technical plan, and work plan. Respondents will be scored on a 1-5 scale across various criteria, and the total maximum score is 8.5.
The RFP also provides details on the related state and local contract opportunity, which involves the migration of the LAS/PBS data application. The contract opportunity is open to qualified vendors, and responses must comply with the terms and conditions stated in the RFP. The public opening will be conducted through a conference call, and the deadline for filing protests is outlined in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment G Technical Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria
INSTRUCTIONS
Each evaluator should read all Responses before attempting to assign scores to any one Response. Evaluators must score each Respondent being evaluated on a separate score sheet.
Throughout the evaluation process, the confidentiality and security of the Responses and the scoring process must be maintained.
Response Evaluation – The evaluation team will independently score the Technical Response (Tabs B-E). The evaluation team will not review or evaluate any other tabs of the Response.
Respondent's will be scored 1-5 on the criteria outlined in the Vendor Scorecard. A score between 1-5 will be assigned to each criteria in the scorecard. The average score from each tab will be multiplied by their weight and then doubled. The total maximum score is 8.5.
Scoring should reflect the evaluator’s independent evaluation of the Respondent’s overall response based on each criterion and should consider the Respondent’s ability to meet each function, characteristic, performance level, or specification described in the solicitation. A Respondent who exceeds the function, characteristic, performance level, or specification described in the solicitation should receive a higher score than a Respondent who merely meets the function, characteristic, performance level, or specification.
The number of Vendors listed on the Vendor Scorecard is only used as an example.
Once the evaluator has completed a score sheet for each Response, the evaluator will submit the completed score sheets to the Procurement Officer.
LASPBS Modernization - EOG-RFP-23-01
VENDOR 1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
VENDOR 1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
VENDOR 1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
Key Personnel - Names and Resume of each person Names and Resumes (incl certifications)
Key Personnel - Role, Responsibilites and Functions of each person Specific roles / skills and functions
Key Personnel - Allocation of each person to this project Percentage of time of each person to be devoted to project
Key Personnel - Assigned tasks for each person Specific tasks
Technical Approach - Location Physical presence of organization and means to accomplish Scope of Services
Admin & Mgmt - Services Reliability Methods to providing reliable service
Subcontractors / Partnerships Completed identification and role
Average Score
Average Score Tab C. Respondent's Management Plan BASIS FOR SCORE
Admin & Mgmt - Management Style and Methodology Management Style, Culture and services/project methodology
Admin & Mgmt - Means of Communication Methods of communication
Admin & Mgmt - Organizational Structure Description of organization's structure
Admin & Mgmt - Control Costs / Financial Viability Methodology of controlling costs
Exec Summary - Written Non-Technical Language Summarize overall capabilities and approach to complete project in clarity
Capabilities and Approaches for accomplishing the services Convincing capabilities and approach
Tab D. Respondent's Technical Plan BASIS FOR SCORE Technical Approach - Purpose Approach and methodology to accomplish Scope of Services
Admin & Mgmt - Schedule Control & Reliability Methods to control reliable project/work schedule
Admin & Mgmt - Means of Coordination Methods of project teams coordination and work plan
References At least 3 separate and verifiable references or organizations
Tab B. Executive Summary, Experience and References BASIS FOR SCORE
CRITERIA
Scores Available from 1-5.
Technical Approach - Respondent's proposed deliverables and timeline Verfiable and quantifiable deliverables and timeline
VENDOR 1 VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
CRITERIA SCORES WEIGHT
VENDOR 1
WEIGHTED
SCORE
VENDOR 2
WEIGHTED
SCORE
VENDOR 3
WEIGHTED
SCORE
NOTES
A. Executive Summary, Experience and References 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 B. Management Plan 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 C. Technical Plan 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 D. Respondent's Work Plan 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Score 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00
*Score Example based on 5 points maximum A = 90 to 100% of max. points = Score of 5 B = 80 to 89% of max. points = Score of 4 C = 70 to 79% of max. points = Score of 3 D = 60 to 69% of max. points = Score of 2 F = 0 to 59% of max. points = Score of 1
Technical Approach - Respondent's ability to meet all requirements Capabilities to accomplish Scope of Services
Technical Approach - General Requirements Understanding the Business Requirements, Vision & Scope
Estimated project hours Estimates total hours to complete project
Average Score
Technical Approach - Questions Responses Completeness and accuracy
Average Score Tab E. Respondent's Work Plan BASIS FOR SCORE
Technical Approach - Solution is sustainable and maintainable Requirements and scope complete
Hours broken down by skill classification and roles Work Plan / Work Breakdown Structure with details of staff hours for each skill/role to complete the work
Prior Revelant Experience & Success Verifiable details of prior completion of similar projects
| Vendor Scorecard |
| Vendor Scorecard - LASPBS Conversion v2 (003).pdf |
| Vendor Scorecard |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .