Attachment G -Commonwealth Response to Vendors Question Form- RFP 758 2600000115 Kentucky 811 Training Modules.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Kentucky 811 Training Module
- Solicitation number
- RFP-758-2600000115-3
- Issued by
- Kentucky
About this file
This is a Commonwealth Response to Vendors Question Form for RFP 758 2600000115, issued by the Commonwealth of Kentucky Public Service Commission (PSC) for the development of Kentucky 811 training modules. The Commonwealth seeks a solution to convert existing in-person training into an online format, with flexibility for vendors to propose either a customized off-the-shelf module or a newly developed eLearning course based on PSC's existing materials. The training modules must accommodate approximately 400-500 required users annually, with an option for public access. The PSC will provide existing training materials including videos and PowerPoint presentations to the awarded contractor and will conduct minimum bi-weekly collaborative meetings throughout the project duration. The modules should be accessible via the Commonwealth's current website, as no learning management system is currently in place. Certificates of completion are required for public users, though detailed attendance records are only necessary for required trainees. Spanish language translation of the training modules is the vendor's responsibility.
The Commonwealth clarified that it does not have access to FTI systems and does not currently operate a SharePoint site or learning management system. Vendors must submit examples of prior experience as PDF attachments rather than hyperlinks to avoid broken links. The scope of course content is flexible, with the Commonwealth indicating that as many training tasks as necessary should be included to complete the required material. Exam requirements, including question types and quantity, are detailed in the Revised Attachment A, Section 3.1.F. The file does not specify pricing terms, contract duration, award dates, set-asides, incumbents, or funding amounts and sources.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Attachment G - Commonwealth Response to Vendors Question Form | |||||
| RFP 758 2600000115 | |||||
| Ques # | RFP Section / Requirement Number | Document | Document Page Number | Vendor Questions | Commonwealth Response |
| 1 | 3.1.A | Attachment A | Pg. 5 | Is the Commonwealth requiring an existing training module or would it be open to an entirely custom solution? | Vendors should propose their best solution that meets the requirements of this RFP and submit their response in accordance with Section 6 of Attachment A. |
| 2 | 4.1 | Attachment A | Pg. 6 | Does the Commonwealth have a learning management system in place where this could be hosted? | No | |
| 3 | 3.1.B | Attachment A | Pg. 5 | What materials currently exist concerning the information provided during the monthly in-person training? (e.g. videos, powerpoint slides, handouts). And, will those materials be made available to the Contractor? | Video, powerpoint. Will be made available to the awarded contractor. | |
| 4 | 4.19 | Attachment A | Pg. 14 | Does the Commonwealth anticipate the Contractor will have access to FTI? | No | |
| 5 | 6.6.A.a. | Attachment A | Pg. 22 | Instructions say offerors should NOT include hyperlinks. How would you prefer that offerors demonstrate their prior experience or show examples of similar work? | Attach as PDF files. The Commonwealth requests hyperlinks not be included due to the possibility of broken links. | |
| 6 | 2.2 | |||||
| 3.1.A | Attachment A | 4-5 | The RFP references both the conversion of existing in-person training to an online format and the provision of an “off-the-shelf digital workplace safety training module that can be updated to craft a solution.” Could the State please confirm whether it is seeking: |
1. A ready-made (off-the-shelf) online safety training module that can be tailored to PSC’s requirements, or
2. Development of a new custom eLearning course based on PSC’s existing in-person materials, or if both options are acceptable for consideration?
| Vendors should propose their best solution that meets the requirements of this RFP and submit their response in accordance with Section 6 of Attachment A. | |||||
| 7 | 3.1, E-F | Attachment A | 5 | What records or reports need to be kept to document an individual's participation or attendance? Who needs to see training records? Does the attendee need to receive a certificate of attendance? | See Revised Attachment A, Section 3.1.F. |
| 8 | Do you currently have a sharepoint site or learning management system? Would it be acceptable to have the target audience for this training access it via your current website, sharepoint site, or LMS? | No. It would be acceptable if the audience could access the training module via our current website. | |||
| 9 | 2 | RFP | 4-5 | Estimate Number of Users? | Required, approximately 400-500 per year. We would like for it to have a option to be open to the public for needed training. These users would receive a certificate of completion but would not need the other data saved. |
| 10 | 2 | RFP | How many tasks? | As many as it takes to complete needed material for the required training. | |
| 11 | 3.1 | RFP | 4-5 | Will the PSC provide a Spanish translator for the project? | No. Vendor will need to provide the translation of their product. See Attachment A, Section 2.2, Section 3.1.B, Section 6.8.D |
| 12 | 2 | RFP | 4-5 | Will the PSC share current training presentation, script, or other training materials that may help inform size and scope of course content? | Yes. Agency will provide materials via email/download and will schedule teams meeting to colaberate and answer any questions awarded vendor may have. These meetings will be at a minimum bi/weekly until the project concludes. |
13 2 RFP 4-5 Will an exam be needed? If so, approximately how many questions and what question type (mutliple choice, multiple response, open response, etc.) See Revised Attachment A, Section 3.1.F.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .