Attachment D and D-1.pdf

2 MB Posted

Attached to
Type 2 Restricted Category Turbine Powered Helicopter
Solicitation number
S-62900-00015613
Issued by
Oregon

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This is an Attachment D and D-1 reference documentation file for an Oregon state procurement bid (S-62900-00015613) for Type 2 Restricted Category Turbine Powered Helicopter services. The file establishes the reference evaluation requirements and scoring methodology for proposers responding to this opportunity. Proposers are required to submit three professional references with complete contact information including firm name, address, contact person title, phone number, and email. The references account for a maximum of 30 points in the overall evaluation scoring and will be contacted and assessed by the Evaluation Committee.

The reference score sheet details the evaluation process whereby Committee members will make up to three attempts to contact each listed reference using a standardized questionnaire. References are scored on a 1-5 scale across six questions assessing contractor responsiveness, customer satisfaction, safety attention, work quality, budget adherence, and financial capability to maintain aircraft and personnel in the field. Each reference's total score is divided by three to calculate the final reference score. Failure to provide contactable references results in zero points for that reference. If references cannot be reached after three contact attempts, the proposer receives no points for that particular reference.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment F.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT A_SampleContract_T2HeliMultiple.pdf PDF
Attachment B.pdf PDF
Attachment C.pdf PDF
RFP_T2HeliMultiple.pdf PDF
Attachment E.pdf PDF
Attachment I.pdf PDF
Public Opening Meeting Information~10.pdf PDF
Attachment H and H-1.pdf PDF
Attachment G and G-1.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

OregonBuys Bid# S-62900-00015613– Type 2 Restricted Category Turbine Powered Helicopter

ATTACHMENT D

PROPOSER’S REFERENCES

(PROPOSER MUST COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS PAGE WITH ITS PROPOSAL)

(30 POINTS MAX)

PROPOSER: __________________________________________________________

References will be evaluated by the Evaluation Committee and scored for a maximum of 30 possible points.

REFERENCE #1

CONTACT PERSON:

REFERENCE #2

REFERENCE #3

FIRM NAME:

ADDRESS:

POSITION TITLE:

PHONE NUMBER:

EMAIL:

OregonBuys Bid# S-62900-00015613– Type 2 Restricted Category Turbine Powered Helicopter

ATTACHMENT D-1

REFERENCE SCORE SHEET EXAMPLE

(FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY)

PROPOSER NAME: __________________________________________________________________

REFERENCE NAME: __________________________________________________________________

1st ATTEMPT (Date & Time Contacted): ____________________________________________

2nd ATTEMPT (Date & Time Contacted), if applicable: ____________________________

3rd ATTEMPT (Date & Time Contacted), if applicable: ____________________________

Questions are scored on a basis of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best. Each reference provided, up to three (3) references, will be contacted and asked the same six (6) questions. During the reference checks, the Evaluation Committee member(s) will make three (3) attempts to contact the listed references provided by Proposer. If the Committee member(s) is unable to contact a reference, the Proposer will receive zero (0) points for that reference.

Total Score divided by three (3) = Final Score

Questions: “I will ask you the following questions and please respond on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the best.”

1. Please rate the contractor’s responsiveness when contacted.

1 2 3 4 5

2. As a customer, please rate the satisfaction of the services you received.

3. How would you rate the contractor’s attention to safety?

4. On a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being exceptional what was the quality of the work performed?

5. Was work performed within the proposed amount?

1=Never 2=Rarely 3=Sometime 4=Most of the time 5=Always

6. Was the company financially capable of maintaining aircraft and personnel in the field?

1=Never 2=Rarely 3=Sometime 4=Most of the time 5=Always

EVALUATOR: ___________________________

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

PROPOSER:
1:
2:
CONTACT PERSON:
POSITION TITLE PHONE NUMBER EMAIL_2:
1_2:
2_2:
CONTACT PERSON_2:
POSITION TITLE PHONE NUMBER EMAIL_4:
1_3:
2_3:
CONTACT PERSON_3:
POSITION TITLE PHONE NUMBER EMAIL_5:
POSITION TITLE PHONE NUMBER EMAIL_6:
PROPOSER NAME:
REFERENCE NAME:
1st ATTEMPT Date Time Contacted:
2nd ATTEMPT Date Time Contacted if applicable:
3rd ATTEMPT Date Time Contacted if applicable:
divided by three 3 Final Score:
EVALUATOR:
POSITION TITLE PHONE NUMBER EMAIL:
0:
1:
POSITION TITLE PHONE NUMBER EMAIL_3:
0:
1:
2:
Check Box4:
2:
0: Off
1: Off
2: Off
3: Off
3:
0: Off
1: Off
2: Off
3: Off
4:
0: Off
1: Off
2: Off
3: Off
1:
0: Off
1: Off
2: Off
3: Off
0:
0: Off
1: Off
2: Off
3: Off
Total Score:
0:
1:
2:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .