Attachment C - Evaluation Criteria.pdf

PDF 88 KB Posted

Attached to
Digital Security Solutions (RFP No. 24-43230000-RFP-2)
Solicitation number
RFP-10809
Issued by
Leon County, Florida

About this file

This is an Evaluation Criteria document (Attachment C) from the Florida Department of Management Services for the Digital Security Solutions RFP (No. 24-43230000-RFP-2). The document outlines the scoring methodology for three key components: Price Proposals, Experience Responses, and Technical Responses. For Technical Responses, respondents must address multiple prompts found in Attachments L1-L16, with Prompt 1 being mandatory and scored on a 0-5 point scale based on how well the proposed solution meets requirements.

The Price Proposal scoring allows up to 0.75 points total, with points awarded for basic compliance (0.25), tiered pricing (0.25), and not-to-exceed pricing (0.25). Experience Responses are scored as pass/fail with 0.25 points awarded for submission. Technical Responses for prompts beyond Prompt 1 are scored on a 0-4 point scale ranging from "No Response/Inadequate" to "Superior," with scores averaged across all prompts. The Procurement Officer combines and averages all evaluator scores to determine final technical response scores for each proposed solution.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment A - SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment J - PUR 2024 Forced Labor Form.pdf PDF
Attachment K - PUR 1355.pdf PDF
Attachment L1 - Service Category 1 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L11 - Service Category 11 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L3 - Service Category 3 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L8 - Service Category 8 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L9 - Service Category 9 Response.docx DOCX document
Digital Security Solutions RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment A - SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment D - Enterprise Standard Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Draft State Term Contract.pdf PDF
Attachment J - PUR 2024 Forced Labor Form.pdf PDF
Attachment K - PUR 1355.pdf PDF
Attachment L12 - Service Category 12 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L13 - Service Category 13 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L4 - Service Category 4 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L6 - Service Category 6 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Draft State Term Contract.pdf PDF
Attachment G - Certification of Drug Free Workplace.pdf PDF
Attachment I - PUR 2023 - Provision of Commodities Produced by Forced Labor.pdf PDF
Attachment L12 - Service Category 12 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L15 - Service Category 15 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L16 - Service Category 16 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L4 - Service Category 4 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L5 - Service Category 5 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L7 - Service Category 7 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L8 - Service Category 8 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment M - Experience.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment C - Evaluation Criteria.pdf PDF
Attachment D - Enterprise Standard Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
Attachment J - PUR 2024 Forced Labor Form.pdf PDF
Attachment L10 - Revised Service Category 10 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L3 - Revised Service Category 3 Response.docx DOCX document
Digital Security Solutions RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment B - Price Proposal.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - Enterprise Standard Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
Attachment L11 - Revised Service Category 11 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L5 - Revised Service Category 5 Response.docx DOCX document
Addendum No. 2 & Additional Q&A.pdf PDF
Attachment A - SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Draft State Term Contract.pdf PDF
Attachment G - Certification of Drug Free Workplace.pdf PDF
Attachment L14 - Revised Service Category 14 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L4 - Revised Service Category 4 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment L5 - Revised Service Category 5 Response.docx DOCX document
Attachment M - Revised Experience.docx DOCX document
Addendum No. 2 & Additional Q&A.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment C Evaluation Criteria

Price Proposal Scoring Methodology: For each Solution proposed for a Service Category, the Respondent may be awarded up to 0.75 points for its Price Proposal. Pricing for add-On Services will not be evaluated. Using the scale below, the Procurement Officer will determine if the Price Proposal receives a score of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 or zero (0) points.

SCORING Assessment Assessment Criteria 0 Fail Respondent failed to submit a Price Proposal that complies with the instructions in Attachment B, Price Proposal.

0.25 Pass Respondent submitted a Price Proposal that complies with the mandatory requirements in Attachment B, Price Proposal.

0.25 Tiered Pricing Respondent’s submitted Price Proposal provides tiered pricing for the proposed Solution.

0.25 Not-to-

Exceed Pricing

Respondent’s submitted Price Proposal provides not-to-exceed pricing for the proposed Solution.

Experience Response Scoring Methodology: The Experience Response will be independently reviewed and scored. Using the scale below, each Evaluator will determine if the experience scores one quarter point (.25) or zero (0) points.

EVALUATOR

SCORING

Assessment Assessment Criteria

0 Fail Respondent failed to submit an Experience Response.

0.25 Pass Respondent submitted an Experience Response.

All Evaluator scores for a Respondent’s Experience Response will be totaled and averaged by the Procurement Officer to create a Respondent’s total experience response score. The points assessed for this total experience response will be part of the calculation for a Respondent’s total final score for a proposed Solution.

Technical Response Scoring Methodology: Attachments L1-L16 contain varying number of prompts requesting descriptions of a Respondent’s proposed Solution. A technical response for a proposed Solution must provide a response to Prompt 1, which will be will be independently reviewed and scored by each Evaluator using the following methodology:

EVALUATOR

SCORING

Assessment Assessment Criteria

0 Inapplicable The Solution proposed does not have the ability to satisfy any of the requirements of the Prompt.

1 Meets One The Solution proposed only meets a single requirement and otherwise fails to meet other requirements.

2 Meets Few The Solution proposed only a few requirements and otherwise fails to meet other requirements.

3 Meets Some The Solution proposed only meets some requirements and otherwise fails to meet other requirements.

4 Meets Most The Solution proposed meets most requirements and otherwise fails to meet other requirements.

5 Meets Requirements

The Solution proposed is capable of satisfying the requirements of the Prompt.

A technical response for a proposed Solution should respond to the remaining prompts for the applicable Service Category. Each remaining response to the applicable prompts for a proposed Solution (i.e., prompt 2 through the remainder) for a given Service Category will be independently reviewed and scored by each Evaluator using the following methodology:

EVALUATOR

SCORING

Assessment Assessment Criteria

0 No Response/ Inadequate

The Respondent did not respond to this Prompt or the Solution proposed does not have the ability to satisfy the requirements of the Prompt.

1 Poor The Solution proposed can minimally or partially satisfy the requirements of the Prompt.

2 Adequate The Solution proposed can adequately and mostly satisfy the requirements of the Prompt.

3 Good The Solution proposed can fully satisfy the requirements of the Prompt.

4 Superior The Solution proposed can fully satisfy the requirements of the Prompt and provides additional benefits above the requirements.

The responses to the remaining prompts for the proposed Solution will be individually assessed a score of zero (0) points to four (4) points. The Procurement Officer will total those scores and then divide that by the number of prompts to determine the average score for the remaining prompts.

The Procurement Officer will combine an evaluator’s Prompt 1 score with the average score for the remaining prompts, creating the Evaluator’s Technical Response Score. The Procurement Officer will then combine the Evaluator’s Technical Response Scores and average these scores, creating the total technical response score for the Solution.

Attachment C

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .