ATTACHMENT B Past Perfermance Questionnair-.docx
DOCX document 53 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construction Management (CM) Services IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F19R0065
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a construction management services IDIQ contract opportunity with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The nationwide IDIQ contract will have a one-year base period and four one-year option periods, with task orders issued for comprehensive CM services to VA offices. The requirement is set aside fully for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. Offerors must submit completed past performance questionnaires from references as part of their proposals. The questionnaire requests ratings on quality, schedule, customer satisfaction, management, cost, safety, and general performance. Respondents are asked to provide comments on strengths, weaknesses and other insights.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10F19R0065-0003Claifications.pdf | ||
| 36C10F19R0065 0002 CM Sev.pdf | ||
| 36C10F19R0065 0001-Amendment.pdf | ||
| Attachment C - Pricing Worksheet (Spreadsheet) 6012020.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT A PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINES-Qualifications Capabilities-.pdf | ||
| 36C10F19R0065 Solicitation CMServsIDIQ.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT B
Past Performance Questionnaire
(Include this attachment if past performance questionnaires are requested in the solicitation and evaluated)
NOTE: The past performance questionnaire is optional and provided for illustrative purposes only.
PACKAGE INFORMATION AND FORMS
Instructions to Offeror for sending Reference Questionnaire Forms: Prepare and send a reference questionnaire package for each project listed on your Attachment B, Performance Relevancy Questionnaires. You are encouraged to send a questionnaire to other clients of contracts listed in your “List of projects”. For Government contracts, send to Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is your responsibility to follow-up and to encourage your references to send in their questionnaire. If you have multiple references at one location, send one cover letter and questionnaire for each contract you want a reference for. Your questionnaire package should contain the following.
· Cover Letter (See attached Sample)
· Respondent Identification and Ratings. Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes
· Suggested – Pre-Addressed stamped envelope to return to Contracting Officer.
OFFEROR SHOULD PLACE THEIR NAME ON TOP OF EACH QUESTIONNAIRE PAGE!!!
OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES
SAMPLE COVER LETTER
AND
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Your Company Letterhead
Date: _________________
To: ______________________________________
We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Construction & Facilities Management. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306(e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN <Add Due Date>. Do not return them to our company. NOTE: ELECTRONICALLY SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES BY EMAIL TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER.
or email to: Katie.Washington@va.gov and Derek.underwood2@va.gov
If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Katie Washington at 202-821-2620.
Thank you for your assistance.
Katie C. Washington
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION AND RATINGS
(Part 1 Contractor submitting Proposal fill-in)
Reference is provided for: ____________________________________
Contract Number or Project Title___________________________________________ Date of Award/Completion Date______________________________________________________ Location_________________________________________________________________________ Dollar Amount____________________________________________________________________ Brief Description of work and your role in the referenced contract: ___________________________
(Part 2 Person providing Reference) Reference is provided by: ____________________________
Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________________ Business Address; ________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________________________________________________ Relationship to Contract: ___________________________________________________________ If information in Part 1 is not accurate, please indicate.
To obtain an electronic version of the form please contact: katie.washington@va.gov .
THE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS: Via email to the email address shown above.
Mark cover sheet: (Attention: Solicitation 36C10F19R0065 “Source Selection Sensitive Information”)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number: Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
| 4. Project Description: | |||
| Complexity of Work | High | Med | Routine |
How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name: Title:
Phone Number: Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. |
There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
ATTACHMENT B -36C10F19R0065
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| c) Government Property Control | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes |
No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes
No
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes |
No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the user’s rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E
VG
S
M
U
N
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes |
No
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .