Attachment A - Functionality Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IT DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING SOFTWARE
- Solicitation number
- 5400030169
- Issued by
- Richland County, South Carolina
About this file
This is a Functionality Matrix attachment for a South Carolina IT Disaster Recovery Planning Software procurement (Instructions 5400030169). The document serves as an evaluation tool requiring vendors to indicate how their proposed solutions align with the State's functional and technical requirements. Offerors must complete all sections of the Requirements tab and mark each preference with an "X" to indicate the level of functionality supported (Base Functionality, Configuration, Custom Development, or Not Supported) and the complexity level of implementation (High, Medium, or Low). The matrix contains 11 mandatory requirements (1.1 through 1.11) that proposals must meet to avoid elimination, including capabilities for importing, exporting, creating, editing, maintaining, reviewing, approving, verifying, publishing, archiving, and testing disaster recovery plans; providing configurable templates; supporting multiple file formats; maintaining version history; offering centralized searchable repositories; enabling custom reporting; facilitating disaster recovery exercises; ensuring multi-tenant data separation; providing role-based training; delivering 24x7x365 technical support; and protecting all State data.
The matrix also addresses critical and desired functional capabilities spanning workflow management, multi-approval processes, role-based permissions, plan associations with business services and infrastructure, backup and recovery procedures, testing and simulation scheduling, dashboards and reporting, mass-notification services, offline plan exports, full-text search functionality, database management, browser-based interfaces, data security and encryption, audit trails, single sign-on and multi-factor authentication, compliance with regulatory standards (PCI, HIPAA/PHI, CJIS, IRS Pub 1075), geographic data storage within the United States, performance metrics with 99.9% availability SLA, application configuration and customization capabilities, system administration functions, and disaster recovery protections including encrypted backups and tested restoration procedures. Vendors must submit completed spreadsheets in Microsoft Excel 2003 or 2007 format without alterations to structure, formatting, or headings, and provide detailed textual responses demonstrating compliance rather than simple agreement statements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment D - Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C - Supplier Experience Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions 5400030169 - IT Disaster Recovery Planning Software
| Attachment A - Functionality Matrix |
| Instructions: |
| This spreadsheet provides Offerors the opportunity to describe how the attributes and capabilities of their proposed solution align with DTO's functional and technical preferences. |
1 Offerors must complete each section of all the "Requirements" tab. Failure to do so may result in your Proposal being rejected.
2 Each preference has four functionality columns labeled Base Functionality, Configuration, Custom Development, and Not Supported.
Offerors must indicate the level of functionality supported by adding an "X" mark in the appropriate column for each preference.
3 Each preference has three configuration / customization complexity columns labeled High, Medium, and Low.
Offerors must indicate the level of complexity by adding an "X" mark in the appropriate column for each preference.
4 The response/description area immediately below each preference allows the entry of textual information.
Offerors must use this space to describe in detail how their proposed solution conforms with the preference. Precise references to other portions of the submission may be used as necessary. Simply repeating the preference or stating agreement will not be considered a satisfactory response.
5 There are 11 mandatory requirements (1.1 through 1.11). Proposals that do not meet these requirements may be eliminated from further consideration.
The Offeror must provide a text response in sufficient detail to demonstrate their proposal's compliance.
6 Offerors must submit the completed spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel 2003 or 2007 format.
Cells may be expanded to accommodate text responses. However, other formatting changes such as removing or inserting rows or columns, renumbering preferences, hiding or protecting cells, altering colors or fonts, or modifying headings are not permitted and may be grounds to dismiss a proposal.
Requirements Disaster Recovery Planning Software - 5400030169
Attachment A - Functionality Matrix
| Functionality Delivered Through (indicate with 'X') | Configuration / Customization Complexity (indicate with 'X') | Mandatory (M), Critical (C), or Desired (D) | |||||||
| Preference Description | Base Functionality | Configuration | Custom Development | Not | |||||
| Supported | High | Medium | Low | Priority | |||||
| 1 | Mandatory Requirements | ||||||||
| 1.1 | The solution must allow authorized users to import, export, create, edit, maintain, review, approve, verify, publish, archive, and test disaster recovery plans and related artifacts. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.2 | The solution must provide configurable templates for disaster recovery plans, recovery runbooks, checklists, contact lists, system inventories, testing records, and after-action reports. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.3 | The solution must be compatible with several file formats for input and export, including xls, xlsx, xlsm, doc, docx, vsd, vsdx, ppt, pptx, pdf, txt, csv, mpp, and other common formats. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.4 | The solution can retain version history, identify who changed information and when, compare revisions, preserve approved and published snapshots, and restore an authorized prior version. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.5 | The solution must provide a centralized searchable repository, so that users can search and filter by UGUs, plan owners, approval status, review, and test dates. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.6 | The solution supports custom report creation, including simple dashboards and dynamic dashboards. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.7 | The solution must support the facilitation of tracking Disaster Recovery exercises and communication among stakeholders during events. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.8 | The solution must support Multi-tenant Instances: each UGU's data must remain logically separated from other UGUs to prevent data commingling. | ||||||||
| M | |||||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.9 | The solution must include role-based administrator and end-user training, reusable training materials, job aids, and recordings of instructor-led training sessions. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.10 | The solution must include 24x7x365 access to technical support, documented severity levels, response and restoration targets, escalation procedures, and phone and web-based support channels. | M | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 1.11 | The solution must provide data protection and recovery for all State data. | ||||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2 | Functional Capabilities | ||||||||
| Critical or Desired | |||||||||
| 2.1 | The solution enables users to create, edit, and manage workflows through a container or wizard that shows actionable steps via a workflow notification link. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.2 | The solution should support workflow and permission management, allowing users to review and approve documentation through a multi-approval process with single or multiple approvers at each development stage. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.3 | The solution supports configurable plan ownership, contributor, reviewer, approver, and read-only roles, together with due dates, reminders, escalations, publication, and recurring recertification workflows. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.4 | The solution should be able to associate plans with business services, business processes, applications, infrastructure, locations, vendors, recovery tiers, dependencies, owners, recovery time objectives, and recovery point objectives. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.5 | The solution should document and manage backup, replication, failover, restoration, validation, fallback, and return-to-normal procedures for in-scope systems and data. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.6 | The solution should schedule and manage simulations, technical recovery tests, and failover tests, including scenarios, objectives, participants, responsibilities, evidence, results, and approvals. | D | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.7 | The solution should create and track test findings, risks, issues, lessons learned, corrective actions, owners, priorities, due dates, status, and closure evidence | D | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.8 | The solution should support configurable dashboards and reports for plan currency, approval status, overdue reviews, test coverage, recovery objective gaps, unresolved findings, and organizational risk. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.9 | The solution should provide native mass-notification services, or a fully supported integration included in the proposed solution, for sending email, SMS or text, voice, and mobile or push communications to predefined and ad hoc recipient groups. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.10 | The solution should support reusable message templates, call trees, two-way acknowledgments, delivery status, failed-delivery reporting, recipient escalation, and event-level communication logs. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.11 | The solution should support authorized users in creating encrypted or access-controlled offline copies and printable exports of approved plans, contacts, checklists, and recovery runbooks. | C | |||||||
| Response/Description: | |||||||||
| 2.12 | The solution should support full-text search, filtering, tags, metadata, cross-references, and attachment management across plans, systems, locations, contacts, tests, risks, and findings. | D | |||||||
| Response/Description: |
| 3 | Technical Requirements | |
| 3.1 | The solution should configure and manage databases, document repositories, and notification services. | D |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 3.2 | The solution should be browser-based, require no proprietary desktop plug-ins for standard functions, support commonly used browsers, and provide responsive mobile access. | C |
| Response/Description: |
| 4 | Architecture | |
| 4.1 | The solution should be able to logically isolate State data from other customers' data and use redundant production components to eliminate single points of failure for critical functions. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 5 | Database / Data Management | |
| 5.1 | The solution should support bulk export of existing plans, contacts, inventories, attachments, and related records. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 5.2 | The solution should support required fields, input validation, controlled values, referential integrity, and duplicate detection. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 5.3 | The solution should be able to provide audit history in documented, commonly usable formats at any time and upon contract termination. | D |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 5.4 | The vendor recognizes the State's ownership of its data and permits complete export of records, attachments, metadata, relationships. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 6 | Interfaces | |
| 6.1 | Solution has an intuitive, web-based interface that is easily configured to adapt to a wide variety of workflows and automated or auto-assisted processes. Service is available over the Internet. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 6.2 | Solution provides a separate administrative interface with drag-and-drop support for folders and objects, standard Windows keyboard shortcuts, online help, navigation wizards, search capabilities, and standard word processing functionality. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 6.3 | Solution provides customizable and configurable context-specific help within the system. | D |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7 | Security | |
| 7.1 | The solution supports single sign-on, multi-factor authentication for privileged accounts, and role-based access control. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.2 | The solution has the capability to encrypt State data in transit and at rest using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) AES-256. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.3 | The solution can maintain tamper-evident audit records for authentication, administrative actions, configuration changes, content changes, approvals, exports, testing activities, and emergency communications. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.4 | The solution should have the capability to generate information security administrative alerts. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.5 | The solution should be able to make authorized audit records searchable and exportable, and support retention periods. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.6 | The solution should operate a documented vulnerability and patch management process to remediate identified vulnerabilities within defined, risk-based service levels. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.7 | The Vendor should be compliant with the following regulatory standards: PCI, HIPAA/PHI, CJIS, IRS Pub 1075 | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.8 | The solution should include a documented security incident response process and notify the State of suspected or confirmed incidents affecting State data or service availability within 24 hours of discovery. | D |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 7.9 | The solution should ensure that hosted State data and backups are stored exclusively within the United States. | M |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 8 | Performance and Scalability | |
| 8.1 | Vendor should provide information on Data Center Rollover to an Alternate Facility to address an outage, as well as procedures for planned and emergency maintenance outages. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 8.2 | Vendor should provide acceptable SLA for technical support service level response and resolution times. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 8.3 | Vendor provided SLA for documented guarantee level(s) of 99.9% availability or better, and the actual uptime for the period of 12 months. | M |
| Response/Descripition: | ||
| 8.4 | Vendor provided information on its customer notification procedures for solution maintenance (e.g., planned and unplanned maintenance, bug/fix deployment, feature roll-out). | C |
| Response/Descripition: | ||
| 8.5 | Vendor provides an escalated response SLA for critical outages. | C |
| Response/Descripition: | ||
| 8.6 | Vendor provides an online portal for trouble ticket status reporting. | D |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 9 | Application Configuration | |
| 9.1 | The solution enables users to configure forms, fields, required data, templates, workflows, statuses, roles, notifications, data classification, review cycles, and branding without vendor-developed code. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 9.2 | The solution provides a non-production environment or an equivalent protected configuration workspace and a controlled method to test, document, promote, and roll back configuration changes. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 10 | Application Customization | |
| 10.1 | The solution should ensure that approved custom integrations or extensions are compatible with standard upgrades and are separately identified with all one-time and recurring costs. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 10.2 | The solution should ensure that approved custom integrations or extensions use documented interfaces and are separately identified with all one-time and recurring costs. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 11 | System Administration | |
| 11.1 | The solution should provide an administrative console for managing users, roles, groups, licenses, delegated administrators, authentication settings, integrations, workflows, templates, and system-wide configuration. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 11.2 | The solution provides reports and alerts on service status, failed integrations, jobs, storage, licenses, user activity, security events, and administrative actions. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 12 | Disaster Recovery | |
| 12.1 | The solution should protect State data with encrypted backups, geographically separate copies "Must be within the United States", documented retention periods, recovery capabilities, and regularly tested restoration procedures. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 12.2 | The solution should maintain a documented business continuity and disaster recovery plan for the SaaS service with contractual recovery time objective and recovery point objective values approved by the State. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 12.3 | The solution should test its SaaS disaster recovery capability at least annually, remediate material findings, and provide the State with an executive summary and evidence of test completion. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 12.4 | The vendor has defined escalation contacts for incident requests and updates, aligned with pre-defined timeframes. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 12.5 | Vendor has a service status apparatus to notify the State in case of disasters to support State data recovery and validation within a contractual recovery time objective. | C |
| Response/Description: | ||
| 13.0 | Reporting | |
| 13.1 | The Solution has the capbility for automatic report distribution and scheduling. | C |
| Response/Descripition: | ||
| 13.2 | The solution provides automatic notifications at a user-defined cadence. | D |
Response/Description:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .