ATTACHMENT 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24923R0032
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for construction services. The Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 9 is soliciting proposals for Project 603-22-101 to replace operating room supply heads at the Robley Rex VA Medical Center in Louisville, Kentucky. The project scope involves demolition, construction, HVAC, plumbing, electrical and finish work. The performance period is 270 calendar days and the project value is between $500,000 and $1 million. Offerors must be verified as Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses by the VA Center for Veterans Enterprise. Proposals are due by February 14, 2023. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by contractors and their references to assess quality, schedule, and business relations on prior contracts. Relevant experience and positive recommendations will be evaluated.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project - 603-22-101, Replace ORs 1-3 Supply Heads, Robley Rex VAMC, Louisville, KY. 40206.
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation for construction services to complete Replace ORs 1-3 Supply Heads, Project 603-22-101, at the Robley Rex VAMC, Louisville, KY. 40206.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer – Jeffery Ridenour at jeffery.ridenour@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than February 14, 2023, at 14:00pm Central Standard Time. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (Jeffery.ridenour@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
| Solicitation Number |
| 36C24923R0032 |
| Project/Requirement |
| 603-22-101, Replace ORs 1-3 Supply Heads |
| Customer/Agency |
| Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 9, Murfreesboro, TN 37129 |
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s
2. Name and Address:
3. Contractor Point of Contact:
4. Phone number (with area code):
5. Assessor Contract Award number:
6. Description of Services provided under contract:
7. Contract award date: Contract Amount: Initial Final
8. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
9. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
| __________________________________________ | ________________ |
| (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) | (Date) |
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.)
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.) |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g., maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e., contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
| Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed. |
| Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would not award another contract to this contractor. |
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
| ACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Other
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .