Attachment 7 - JUBJ 22 1016 Construct RIC - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
Construct Research Information Center (Solicitation Amendment 0002)
Solicitation number
FA330024R0037
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity to construct a Research Information Center at Gunter Annex, AFB. The questionnaire requests information about the contractor's past performance, including schedule, quality, subcontractor management, change order processing, and other key areas. The contracting agency, the 42d Contracting Squadron, will be using the completed questionnaires to evaluate the past performance of contractors being considered for this contract. The contract is a competitive procurement with a solicitation number of FA330024R0037. The contract type is not specified. The period of performance and contract value details are requested in the questionnaire. Respondents are asked to provide an overall performance rating and supporting comments for the contractor across various performance criteria.

View the file

Other files

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 7

RFP FA3300-24-R-0037

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Request for Current and Past Performance Evaluation TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation from . This firm is currently being considered for a contract with the Government to construct a Research Information Center at Gunter Annex, AFB.

A member of the Past Performance team will be contacting you via email or phone to complete the attached questionnaire. If you have any questions concerning this request contact SSgt Khadijah Jones at khadijah.jones.1@us.af.mil or Mr. Eldrae Perdue at eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil.

Thank you, Mr. Eldrae Perdue Contracting Officer 42d Contracting Squadron

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A
1.
Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the establish schedule.
2.
Provided an experienced superintendent with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.
3.
Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors.
4.
Paid Subcontractors/suppliesr in a timeley manner.
5.
Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.
6.
Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
7.
Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.
8.
Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
9.
Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation.
10.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
11.
Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages?
YES/NO
12.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO

Explanations/Remarks:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail to: khadijah.jones.1@us.af.mil and eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .