Attachment 7 - HBEX 707 Generative Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment.pdf
PDF 1007 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 2025-19 Microsoft 365 and Related Cloud Services Development, Administration, and Support
- Solicitation number
- 0000039683
- Issued by
- California
About this file
This is a Generative Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment document prepared for Covered California (HBEX 707) in support of RFP 2025-19 for Microsoft 365 and Related Cloud Services Development, Administration, and Support. The assessment evaluates the risks and considerations associated with implementing generative AI technologies within Covered California's Microsoft 365 environment and related cloud services infrastructure. The document provides a comprehensive analysis of potential AI-related risks that may emerge during the development, configuration, migration, integration, and ongoing administration of the Microsoft 365 platform, addressing security, compliance, operational, and governance concerns specific to Covered California's mission-critical healthcare and benefits administration functions.
The risk assessment serves as a foundational document to inform the evaluation criteria and technical requirements for proposers responding to RFP 2025-19. It identifies critical areas where generative AI implementation could impact data security, regulatory compliance with California healthcare laws, organizational controls, and service reliability. The assessment likely establishes guardrails and requirements that selected vendors must adhere to when developing or deploying AI-assisted capabilities within Covered California's cloud infrastructure, ensuring that any AI integration aligns with the organization's risk tolerance and compliance obligations in the highly regulated health insurance marketplace.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2a - Payee Data Record Supplement (STD. 205).pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Proposal Checklist.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit B, Attachment 1 - Cost Worksheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_2025-19.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Bidder Declaration (GSPD-05-105).pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Proposal Cover Page.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - Payee Data Record (STD. 204).pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Contractor Certification Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - SEI Certification.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit B - Budget Detail and Payment Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit C - IT General Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A, Attachment 1 - Work Authorization.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit D - Privacy Addendum.docx | DOCX document | |
| STD 213.pdf | ||
| Exhibit C, Attachment 1 - Resumes.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 8 - DVBE Declarations (STD. 843).pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COVERED CALIFORNIA
GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RISK ASSESSMENT
HBEX 707 (04/25)
GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RISK ASSESSMENT
The Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Risk Assessment form is used by Covered California to evaluate and mitigate potential risks associated with the use and if applicable, procurement of GenAI technologies.
This form helps ensure that any new GenAI tool or software aligns with our data privacy, security, and ethical standards. By completing this form, requestors and vendors provide essential information regarding their GenAI solutions’ capabilities, data handling practices, and safeguards. The objective is to proactively identify and address any privacy concerns, security vulnerabilities, or ethical dilemmas associated with integrating or utilizing GenAI within Covered California.
Section 1: Vendor/Software/Use Case(s) to be completed by the Covered California Requestor Requester Name:
Date Submitted:
This form is to be completed when evaluating or procuring software. If this request doesn’t include software, please mark the box below and return it to the requestor.
This request does not include software
Vendor Information
Vendor Name:
Software Name:
Type of Request: Is it an add-on capability to an already approved tool/software at Covered California? If yes, specify what is being added.
Business Problem for the Requested Tool/Software: What is the use case(s) for the requested tool/ software? For each business problem, specify which division/function(s) it enables.
HBEX 707 - GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RISK ASSESSMENT
Data Privacy Considerations
Will Personal Identifiable Information be accessible to the GenAI tool? If yes, describe the type of data.
Section 2: GenAI Risk Assessment to be Completed by Vendor Contact Name:
Contact Phone:
Contact Email:
Will you and/or your subcontractor(s) use or offer GenAI technology, model, service, or system?
Tool/Software Description
Description of tool/software, including product description. Provide a general description of the tool/ software, including its primary functions and intended use cases.
LLM Models and Entity Affiliations. List all GenAI models (incl. model name, model version, and number of parameters), as well as owners and entities associated with this solution.
• LLM Model Name(s):
• LLM Model Version Number(s):
• LLM Model Parameters:
• LLM Entity Owner:
Yes No (If no, skip to the Signature section of this form)
Hosting, Data Storage, and Security
Question Instructions To be completed by vendor Where is the software hosted?
Specify the hosting environment for the software (e.g., on-premises, private cloud, public cloud, or other). If cloud-hosted, provide the name of the service provider (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP) and the geographic location of the data centers / environments used.
Where is the foundational model (e.g., LLM) hosted?
Indicate where the foundational model (e.g., Large Language Model (LLM)) is hosted.
If cloud-based, specify whether it operates in a multi-tenant or single-tenant environment. If on-premises, describe the security controls in place.
Is customer data stored in a private or shared instance? If private, is the data sent outside of those boundaries?
Specify whether customer data is stored in a private or shared instance. If private, clarify whether data processing occurs solely within that instance or if data is transmitted to external environments for processing, analysis, or model refinement.
Where will the data sources come from and what is the retention policy for customer data?
Identify all data sources feeding into the GenAI system, including structured and unstructured data.
Specify data retention policies, including duration, storage locations, compliance with regulatory standards (e.g., GDPR, CCPA), and data deletion procedures.
Data Usage, Privacy, and Security
Question Instructions To be completed by vendor Is customer data used to train or refine the foundational model or application? If yes, describe how this data is anonymized.
Does the system use customer data for model training, fine-tuning, or continuous learning? If so, detail data anonymization and differential privacy techniques applied, including whether data is stored in a federated learning framework or used for direct model updates.
HostingHostingHosting EnvironmentEnvironmentEnvironment
If other, please specify:
Provider Name:
What security policies / mechanisms does your solution have in place to prevent unauthorize access to customer data?
Specify all security policies and mechanisms/tools in place to prevent unauthorized access to customer data (e.g., RBAC), both within organization and by end-users of the software/tool.
What is the risk of customer data being leaked to the public or unauthorized individuals?
Assess the risk level of customer data exposure due to security vulnerabilities, model inversion attacks, or data extraction techniques. List existing mitigation measures, including encryption, access controls, and monitoring tools.
When is the last time you had a security assessment and penetration testing?
What was the outcome from the assessment and test?
Provide the date of the most recent security audit and penetration testing.
Include details on the scope of testing (e.g., adversarial AI testing, red teaming) and any high-severity vulnerabilities identified.
Can users opt out of data collection, processing or inference by the foundational model?
Describe mechanisms/ information available to inform users of data usage.
Describe any opt-out mechanism in place, including whether these applies globally or per-use session.
What is your general privacy policy?
Provide a link to your company’s privacy policy.
What is your GenAI privacy policy?
Provide a link to your company’s GenAI privacy policy, Ethical AI/Bias Prevention Guardrails
Question Instructions To be completed by vendor Explain how the system prevents bias and remains ethical.
Explain how the system prevents bias and ensures ethical decision-making, considering the following factors:
• Data sourcing and diversity:
Describe measures to ensure training data represents diverse demographics and avoids systemic biases.
• Model fairness techniques: Explain bias mitigation strategies such as adversarial debiasing, reweighting, or fairness-aware loss functions.
• Human oversight: Detail how human-in-the-loop (HITL) methods are applied to validate AI decisions and detect potential ethical risks.
• Compliance and governance:
Outline how the system adheres to ethical AI frameworks, such as NIST AI Risk Management, OECD AI Principles, or the EU AI Act.
Explain how the system ensures outputs are explainable.
Describe what measures are in place to ensure outputs are explainable (e.g., citations / ability to trace reference sources).
Explain how the system prevents inaccurate outputs.
Explain how the system prevents false or misleading outputs (i.e., hallucinations) which may undermine decision-making.
Explain how the system prevents incorrect/ malicious use.
Is there a risk that the application or foundational model could generate harmful, misleading, or non-compliant outputs? If so, describe safeguards such as adversarial robustness testing, response filtering, and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).
By signing this document, I have identified and reported where Covered California may use GenAI regarding the above-mentioned tools/software. If any new or previously unreported GenAI use is identified in the future, we will notify the Covered California contract manager and initiate a new GenAI risk assessment.
Full Printed Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
| Contact Name: |
| Contact Email: |
| LLM Model Parameters: |
| LLM Entity Owner: |
| Date3_af_date: |
| Requestor Name: |
| Date Submitted: |
| Vendor Name: |
| Software Name: |
| Business Problem: |
| Type of Request: |
| Contact Phone: |
| No Software: Off |
| Yes/No: Off |
| Type of Data: |
| Tool/Software Description: |
| LLM Model Name: |
| LLM Model Version Number: |
| On-Premises: [On-Premises] |
| Hosting Environment: |
| Provider Name: |
| Foundational Model Location: |
| Customer Data Storage: |
| Data Sources and Retention Policy: |
| Data Anonymization and Differential Privacy Techniques: |
| Security Policies and Mechanisms/Tools: |
| Risk of Customer Data Being Leaked: |
| Security Assessment and Penetration Testing: |
| Data Usage and Opt-Out Mechanisms/Information and for Users: |
| Company's Privacy Policy Link: |
| Company's GenAI Privacy Policy Link: |
| Ways the System Prevents Bias: |
| Measures to Ensure Outputs Are Explainable: |
| Ways to Prevent Inaccurate Outputs: |
| Ways to prevent Incorrect/Malicious Use: |
| Full Printed Name: |
| Title: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .