Attachment_7_ATROMS_Past_Performance_Rating_Form.pdf
PDF 220 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-23-R-0029
About this file
This document contains a past performance rating form for the Army Training and Range Operations Maintenance Services (ATROMS) contract solicitation. The rating form collects information on a contractor's past performance for six criteria: quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of personnel, and utilization of small business. Raters are asked to provide an adjectival rating and additional comments for each criterion. The solicitation number is W900KK-23-R-0029 and is issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center for the ATROMS contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATROMS_Solicitation_W900KK23R0029_CONFORMED_as_of_Amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| CONFORMED_Copy_ATROMS_Solicitation_as_of_Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| W900KK-23-R-0029_Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_ATROMS_Price_Workbook_Rev 2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_6_ATROMS_Price_Workbook_Updated.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1_ATROMS_PWS Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| W900KK-23-R-0029 Amendment 0001 13 July 2023.pdf | ||
| Copy of Attachment_5_Question_Comment_Form_Consolidated_Questions_7-13-2023.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_3_ATROMS_QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5_Question_Comment_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATROMS_Final_Solicitation_W900KK23R0029.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_ATROMS_Price_Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_4_Procedures_for_Government_Property.pdf | ||
| Appendix_F_GFP.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Appendix_A_CDRLs_A001-A021.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_ATROMS_DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_ATROMS_PWS.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
ATTENTION
Use this space to indicate categories, limited dissemination controls, special instructions, points of contact, etc., if needed.
ATTENTION
All individuals handling this information are required to protect it from unauthorized disclosure.
Handling, storage, reproduction, and disposition of the attached document(s) must be in accordance with 32 CFR Part 2002 and applicable agency policy.
allowed as necessary and permissible to any individual(s), organization(s), or grouping(s) of users, provided such access or dissemination is consistent with or in furtherance of a Lawful Government Purpose and in a manner consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Government-wide policies.
Standard Form 901 (11-18) Prescribed by GSA/ISOO | 32 CFR 2002
CUI
Controlled by: Army Controlled by: ACC-ORL CUI Category: General Procurement and Acquisition Distribution/Limited Dissemination Control: FEDCON POC: Daniel Steinhauer, 407-208-5820
CUI//FEDCON
ATROMS
SOLICITATION NO.
AMENDMENT NO.: 00
Section X.X., Attachment (7)
CUI//FEDCON
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
CONTRACTOR NAME: Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE,
INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
NAME: Click here to enter text.
TITLE: Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.
PHONE: Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL Click here to enter text.
For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control of Utilization of Small Business is N/A, Please explain why. Rater: Please submit completed form as part of Volume 3 (Reference RFP Amendment 0001 Section L for submittal requirements).
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
mailto:usarmy.orlando.peo-stri.mbx.mtccs@mail.mil
SOLICITATION NO.
AMENDMENT NO.: 00
Section X.X., Attachment (7)
CUI//FEDCON
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
SOLICITATION NO.
AMENDMENT NO.: 00
Section X.X., Attachment (7)
CUI//FEDCON
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
SOLICITATION NO.
AMENDMENT NO.: 00
Section X.X., Attachment (7)
CUI//FEDCON
5. MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
RATING Adjectival
Rating Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
SOLICITATION NO.
AMENDMENT NO.: 00
Section X.X., Attachment (7)
CUI//FEDCON
Not Applicable
Click here to enter text.
| CUI_Coversheet |
| Attachment (2) Past Performance Rating Form |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .