ATTACHMENT 4A - QASP Rubric.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Demo Old Combat Comm Sq Bldgs 109 & 121
Solicitation number
W50S8Q-20-B-0007
Issued by

About this file

This document outlines a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for the demolition of two buildings at Springfield Air National Guard Base in Ohio. The project requires demolishing Buildings 109 and 121, including asbestos abatement, demolishing associated pavement and utilities, and completing the area with sod and sidewalk. Performance will be evaluated on completeness, timeliness, and quality of work. The contractor must meet all contract requirements, timelines, and deliver exceptional or acceptable quality. Unacceptable performance will require contractor corrective action approved by the Contracting Officer's Representative and Contracting Officer.

A related solicitation seeks offers for the demolition project with a total contract value between $1-5 million. The Women-Owned Small Business set-aside solicitation was issued by the 178th Wing Contracting Office. The pre-bid conference is September 1st and bids are due September 24th. The 100-day period of performance begins with notice to proceed. The solicitation and amendments are available through the System for Award Management. Questions should be directed to the identified Contract Specialist.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

For: WAAR162003 Demo Old Combat Comm Squadron Bldgs. 109 & 121 Contract Number: PANNGB-19-P-0000 035946 Contract Description: This project consists of demolishing Buildings 109 and 121, including asbestos abatement in both buildings, demolishing pavement leading to the buildings, and the proper capping/tying off of utilities servicing the buildings. It also encompasses removing material or providing any fill needed to produce a level surface and completing the area with sod and sidewalk as specified in the drawings.

Contractor’s name: Contractor’s Name (hereafter referred to as the contractor)

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (KO) & Contract Specialist (KS) - The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The KO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance. The KS acts as an acquisition consultant and serves as liaison between the contractor and the requesting agency.

Assigned KO: MSgt Chad KelleyAssigned KS: 2Lt Tracie McClure
Organization: 178 MSGOrganization: 178 MSG
Telephone: 937.327.2208Telephone: 937.327.2379
Email: chad.e.kelley.mil@mail.milEmail: tracie.e.mcclure.mil@mail.mil

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) & Construction Specialist - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. The contractor shall refer any changes they deem may affect contract price, terms, or conditions to the KO for action. The Construction Specialist assists the COR with daily monitoring of the construction project.

Assigned COR: Lt Col Michel WeitzAssigned Construction Specialist: Nick Owens
Organization: 178 CESOrganization: 178 CES
Telephone: 937.327.2279Telephone: 937.327.2588
Email: michel.d.weitz.mil@mail.milEmail: nicholas.r.owens.nfg@mail.mil

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s Program Manager and Quality Control for this contract.

Program Manager/Contractor Quality Control – Name Telephone: (937)000-0000 Email: Contractor01@Example.com

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

The completeness, timeliness, and satisfaction of the work performed will be evaluated based on the project requirements, period of performance, and quality of the work. Completeness of project requirements means all items specified in the Statement of Work (SOW) are done. Timeliness is evaluated based on the work performed according to the schedule submitted. Quality of work is judged based on appearance and functionality.

5. RATINGS.

A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome.

COMPLETENESS

Yes
Performance met contract requirements.
No
Performance did not meet contract requirements.

TIMELINESS

Blue
Ahead of schedule
Green
On time
Red
Behind schedule

QUALITY

Blue
Exceptional quality; above and beyond expectations
Green
Acceptable quality
Red
Unacceptable quality

6. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE.

Performance will be documented on the Quality Assurance Chart attached.

a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE.

The Government shall document positive performance on the Quality Assurance Chart.

b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE.

When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file. The contractor will propose a corrective action/plan for the COR’s approval. Once approved by the COR and the KO authorizes the work, the contractor will complete the corrective action.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .