Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionairre.docx
DOCX document 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Consolidated Laundry and Linen Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HT940825QE005
- Issued by
- Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation HT940825QE005, a procurement for Consolidated Laundry and Linen Services supporting Altus Air Force Base, OK and Naval Hospital Corpus Christi with outlier locations in Fort Worth and Kingsville, Texas. The questionnaire is designed to capture detailed performance evaluations from previous clients, allowing potential contractors to demonstrate their past performance capabilities through a comprehensive assessment across multiple dimensions including quality of service, schedule management, and overall performance.
The solicitation requires laundry and linen services that meet stringent medical facility standards, including precise documentation of item pick-up and delivery, proper handling, and laundering processes. Services must comply with Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) guidelines, Medical Group Instruction (MDGI) 44-106 Infection and Exposure Control Program, and Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) infection control procedures. The questionnaire enables prospective contractors to provide references and detailed performance ratings that will be used in the evaluation process for this follow-on procurement managed by the Defense Health Agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 9 - Consolidated Laundry and Linen Items.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 5 - Wage Determination 2015-5329 Rev 28 - Altus AFB - Jackson County.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Summary Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 8 - Wage Determination 2015-5305 Rev 27 - Kingsville NBHC - Kleberg County.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - HT940825QE005.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01 - PWS Altus AFB.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Wage Determination 2015-5231 Rev 30 - Fort Worth NBHC - Tarrant County.pdf | ||
| Attachment 02 - PWS Naval Hospital Corpus Christi.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Wage Determination 2015-5225 Rev 28 - Corpus Christi NH - Nueces County.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION HT940825QE005
ATTACHMENT 2
Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire
This attachment is in support of the Solicitation HT940825QE005.
NOTE: For each Project Summary Sheet submitted, the Offeror must submit either a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation or this Past Performance Questionnaire. If CPARS evaluation is available, it must be used and this Attachment 2 should not be submitted.
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):
| Offeror Name: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Contract Number: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Order Number (if applicable): |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Project Title: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Total Period of Performance, Including Options: MM/YYYY - MM/YYYY or MM/YYYY - Present |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
| Name: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Title: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Agency or Customer Organization: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Phone: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| E-mail: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Signature of Rater[footnoteRef:2]: [2: Past Performance Rating must be provided by a Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative or Corporate Officer/Official with knowledge about the project] |
Any questions concerning completion of this form should be addressed to Khaireyal.y.barcia.civ@health.mil and Meagan.e.askew.civ@health.mil.
INSTRUCTIONS
This questionnaire is to be completed as indicated below. For purposes of these evaluations, the term “client engagement” is intended to mean “contract”. This package consists of the following:
| Section |
| Description |
| Who completes |
| Who verifies |
| Section 1 |
| Authorization Letter |
| Offeror |
| N/A |
| Section 2 |
| Client Engagement Profile |
| Offeror |
| Client Point of Contact |
| Section 3 |
| Client Identification |
| Client Point of Contact |
| None |
| Section 4 |
| Evaluation |
| Client Point of Contact |
| None |
| Section 5 |
| Past Performance Summary |
| Client Point of Contact |
| None |
SECTION 1: AUTHORIZATION LETTER
(To be completed by the Offeror)
Past Performance Form Letter Example (This form letter is provided for Offerors to use in transmitting the Past Performance questionnaire to past or current clients)
[Date of Letter] [Name and Address of Offeror’s client] Attention: [Name and Designation of Client’s Contract Manager or Appropriate Contact]
Dear [Contact Name]:
We are currently responding to the Defense Health Agencies (DHA) Solicitation HT940825QE002. DHA is requesting organizations or companies responding to the solicitation to submit evidence of past performance. Through this letter we are requesting your participation to provide an assessment of our firm’s performance. If you are contacted for information on work our firm has performed outside of this written assessment, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries. Your firm’s cooperation with this effort is greatly appreciated. Please direct any questions to [Insert Name and Phone Number for Offeror].
For your reference, we have included a description of the work our firm performed/is performing for your organization. A Past Performance Questionnaire is also enclosed for you to complete. Please verify the accuracy of the data in Sections 2 and 3 of the enclosed evaluation. Then, please complete Sections 4 and 5 and return the signed, completed document by DATE /TIME to [insert].
Sincerely, [Name of Signer] [Designation of Signer]
Past Performance Questionnaire
Solicitation HT940825QE002
When completed, this document contains procurement sensitive information.
SECTION 2: CLIENT ENGAGEMENT PROFILE
(To be completed by the Offeror and verified by the Client Point of Contact (POC)) Client Organization Name
U.S. Federal Government Department and Agency (if applicable)
Contractor Name:
Subcontractors and Partners (if any):
Contract Type:
(e.g., Time and Materials, Fixed Price, Unit-based, Asset-based, etc. or Combination/Hybrid) Please explain fully.
| Was this a Competitive Contract? |
| Yes |
No
Total period of performance, including options: (MM/YYYY - MM/YYYY or MM/YYYY – Present)
Summary Description of Services Provided:
Geographic Coverage of Services for This Contract:
(e.g., Local, National, Global)
Project size:
(e.g., number and type of geographic locations supported concurrently)
Project complexity (e.g., number FTE’s)
SECTION 3: CLIENT IDENTIFICATION
(To be completed by the Client POC) POC Name:
Client POC Title/Position:
Client POC Email Address:
Client POC Phone Number:
Number of years the Client POC was associated with this engagement:
Is Section 2 of this questionnaire accurate?
If No, please explain:
Yes/No
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Evaluation — Please indicate your satisfaction with the service provider’s performance by placing a “X” in the appropriate block using the rating scales to the right of each dimension. Additionally, if desired, please provide a narrative explanation to support your ratings. At a minimum, for any Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. For any rating that is checked Not Applicable, please explain why it does not apply.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Customer should place an “X” on the appropriate qualitative rating. Comments are optional.
| Quality |
| __ Exceptional |
__ Very Good __ Satisfactory __ Marginal __ Unsatisfactory __ Not Applicable
Comment:
General Comments (General compliments, problems, and/or corrective actions taken to address the quality of services):
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
Customer should place an “X” on the appropriate qualitative rating. Comments are optional.
| Schedule |
| __ Exceptional |
__ Very Good __ Satisfactory __ Marginal __ Unsatisfactory
General Comments (General compliments, problems, and/or corrective actions taken to address schedule):
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (General compliments, problems, and/or corrective actions taken to address schedule):
Click here to enter text.
3. MANAGEMENT
Customer should place an “X” on the appropriate qualitative rating. Comments are optional.
| Management |
| __ Exceptional |
__ Very Good __ Satisfactory __ Marginal __ Unsatisfactory
General Comments (General compliments, problems, and/or corrective actions taken to address the management services):
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
SECTION 5: PAST PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Provide an overall rating for the Contractor using the evaluation rating scale below.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| ☐ |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/our organization’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| ☐ |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/our organization’s benefit. The contractual performance being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| ☐ |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| ☐ |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| ☐ |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely would you be to use the Contractor again?
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| Not at | Slightly | Moderately | Very | Extremely | ||||
| all Likely | Likely | Likely | Likely | Likely |
If you have any further information that was not covered by this questionnaire, but you feel is important, please provide this information
Client POC’s Signature
Date
| Please return a scanned copy to: |
| Khaireyal.Y.Barcia.civ@health.mil and Meagan.E.Askew.civ@health.mil |
CUI
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .