Attachment 4 - Past Performance Information Form.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
5 Year Protective Coating IDIQ - Minot AFB, ND Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA452824R0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command

About this file

This document contains a solicitation for a 5-Year Protective Coating Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity contract at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. The contractor will provide all labor, tools, transportation, equipment, materials, supervision, and services required for interior and exterior protective coatings, airfield pavement markings, street and parking lot striping, vinyl wall coverings, floor finishes, and other miscellaneous painting tasks at various facilities. The acquisition is set aside 100% for small businesses with a magnitude between $1 million to $4.9 million. A pre-proposal site visit will be held on March 27, 2024 and proposals are due by April 3, 2024. The Air Force intends to award without discussions. The selected contractor must be able to provide experienced managers, quality control procedures, and timely resolution of issues. Funding is contingent on appropriations.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 5 Year Protective Coating IDIQ - Minot AFB, ND, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment - FA452824R00030001.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA452824R00030001 SF 30.pdf PDF
RFI Tracker - Protective Coating.pdf PDF
RFI Attachment - B870 Floor Plan.pdf PDF
RFI Attachment - Historical Data.pdf PDF
RFI Attachment - B221 Floor Plan.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA452824R0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Offer Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Financial Responsibility.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 - Project Detail - Seed Project.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7 - Subcontractor Consent.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN

FA4528-24-R-0003

Attachment 4

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF)

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: __________________ Telephone : __________________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Submitting Survey as Prime or Sub-Contractor (please circle one) If submitting as Sub-Contractor, Prime Contractors:

Name:___________________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Detailed Description of Work: ______________________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name and Title of Evaluator: ____________________________

Company Name: ______________________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:______________________
_____________________________Email Address: ______________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

EMAIL: bridget.moore.5@us.af.mil and nitra.latta.2@us.af.mil DUTY PHONE: (701) 723-4185 and (701) 723-4189

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24.
Is the contractor rated in CCASS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER ______________

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .