Attachment 4 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 67 KB Posted

Attached to
NSW Preparatory Course Training and Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
H92240-20-R-0004
Issued by
United States Special Operations Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor and details of a solicitation from the Naval Special Warfare Command. The solicitation seeks non-personal services to obtain contractor support for physically and mentally preparing SEAL and SWCC candidates at the NSW Preparatory Course in Great Lakes, Illinois. The requirement includes recruiting, hiring, and maintaining personnel to train candidates. The solicitation number is H92240-20-R-0004 and it is an 8(a) small business set-aside issued by the United States Special Operations Command. Questions regarding the requirement must be submitted using the provided template by April 17, 2020 at 12:00 PM Pacific time. Eligible 8(a) firms are encouraged to review the solicitation and submit proposals in response by the closing date of May 5, 2020 at 12:00 PM Pacific time. The past performance questionnaire requests information about a federal contractor's performance on a previous contract to help evaluate the firm for the current solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NSW Preparatory Course Training and Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
H92240-20-R-0004_Amendment 02.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Pricing Template_Amendment 02.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement_Amendment 01.pdf PDF
H92240-20-R-0004_Amendment 01.pdf PDF
Government QNA_consolidated 23 Apr 20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP H92240-20-R-0004.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Question Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - SCA Wage Determination No. 2015-4936.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Past and Present Performance Information Sheet.doc DOC document
Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

H92240-20-R-0004 - ATTACHMENT 4

TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR’S REFERENCE AND SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

1. The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the Naval Special Warfare Command. You have received this questionnaire because you have been identified as a source of Past Performance Information for that offeror. Any comments you can provide regarding the past performance of the contractor providing this form is greatly appreciated.

2. Please complete the attached questionnaire for the contractor and program described below (to be completed by the offeror) and based on the following guidance. Send the completed questionnaire to jonathan.h.katz.civ@socom.mil prior to the closing date of solicitation H92240-20-R-0004 (current closing date is 5 May 2020 at 1200 Pacific Time). Do not send the completed questionnaire to the contractor. We appreciate your help.

Please fill in all sections. State “not applicable” if question does not apply or you have no comment.

3. Indicate a rating, based on the description below, for the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Underline the selected rating. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the rating levels.

RATING DEFINITIONS

Unsatisfactory Entirely unfavorable past performance. Offeror has consistently not satisfied previous customers and/or violated laws, regulations, and contract requirements. Performance did not meet contractual requirements and any corrective action taken was not effective.

Marginal Record of performance split between favorable & unfavorable. Performance did not meet some of the contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor did not implement or has not implemented satisfactory corrective actions.

Satisfactory Record of performance favorable. Offeror has satisfied previous customers, laws, regulations, and contract requirements.

Very Good Record of performance very favorable. Offeror has satisfied previous customers, laws, regulations, and contract requirements and exceeded some of the contract requirements to the government’s benefit.

Exceptional Record of performance extremely favorable. Offeror has always satisfied previous customers, laws, regulations, and contract requirements to a high degree and exceeded many contractual requirements to the government’s benefit.

4. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, please provide comments on any other programs for which your activity has contracts with this contractor. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Email: jonathan.h.katz.civ@socom.mil with any questions!

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________(FFP, CPFF, etc.)

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________(dates) G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________(total) H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________(total)

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________

C. Geographic and customer description of services provided under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, specific customer, multiple customers, etc.:

D. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ____________________________

E. Description of service provided by the contractor: ______________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSAT

a.) QUALITY:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements

(2) The Contractor successfully recruited, hired, and maintained a high quality workforce

(3) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(4) The Contractor’s performance demonstrated technical excellence and reliability.

b.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The contractor’s actions avoided any negative schedule variances; or, appropriate corrective action was taken.

c.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

d.) MANAGEMENT:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor effectively managed the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification; and took appropriate corrective action when needed.

(3) The Contractor was responsive consistently demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior.

(4) The Contractor was committed to customer satisfaction.

(5) The Contractor was flexible in responding to changing needs, including surge capacity and reachback capability for subject matter experts and key personnel.

(6) The Contractor effectively managed subcontracts for this effort, if applicable.

(7) The Contractor provided effective program management for this effort.

(8) The Contractor effectively managed key personnel with minimum turnover and well qualified replacements.

e.) REGULATORY COMPLIANCE:

(1) The contractor complied with all terms and conditions relating to applicable regulations and codes.

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

Evaluator’s Name/Signature

Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .