Attachment 4 Addendum FAR 52.212-2.pdf
PDF 102 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire Watch/Tank Watch Touch Labor Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4215825QS052
About this file
The document is the Evaluation provision (FAR 52.212-2) for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) contract opportunity for Fire Watch/Tank Watch Touch Labor Support at Norfolk Naval Shipyard. The solicitation will evaluate proposals on two primary factors: (1) Technical Narrative and Price Evaluation, and (2) Contractor Capacity. Technical narratives must demonstrate understanding of the Performance Work Statement and will be rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable, with contractors failing to meet requirements being eliminated from consideration. Price proposals will be assessed for reasonableness, with prices required to remain firm for 60 days, and the total estimated price calculated by aggregating line item amounts.
The contract is a 100% Small Business set-aside with a NAICS code of 336611 and a small business size standard of 1,300 employees. The anticipated performance period is from August 15, 2025, through August 14, 2026, as a Firm Fixed Price Single Award Contract. The procurement will be conducted by the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command, with the Product Service Code J998, seeking touch labor support services for fire watch and tank watch operations.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror that will be most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this solicitation. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award based on initial proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost/price standpoint.
The Offeror’s proposal shall be in the form prescribed by and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the solicitation.
The award decision will be made on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis, cost/price proposal and contractor capacity,
(1) Factor 1 - Technical Narrative and Price Evaluation
(a) Technical Narrative - Technical narrative will represent the assessment of how well you understand and propose to fulfill the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
Vendors must submit a max of sufficient narrative demonstrating their ability to successfully execute the Performance Work Statement. This document should clearly outline their understanding of the requirements, proposed execution strategies, and operational readiness.
Technical acceptability will be defined as follows:
Technical Evaluation Ratings
Contractors who fail to possess an acceptable technical narrative will not be considered for award and the other elements of their quotation will not be evaluated.
(b) Price Reasonableness - The Government will evaluate the proposed price for reasonableness in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)Subpart 13.5 - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items and FAR 13.106-3. The estimated amount for each line item will be added together to determine the total estimated price, which will become the evaluated price.
The vendor’s proposed price will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness. All prices must be considered fair and reasonable as determined by the Government. Price quote shall be held firm and valid for sixty (60) days
(2) Factor 2 - Capacity
(a) Capacity – The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the Offeror’s proposed capacity to satisfy the Government’s requirements. The evaluation of risk is related to the assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated capacity. Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an Offeror’s demonstrated capacity to satisfy the Government’s requirement may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Risk will be considered in the evaluation. Capacity will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the information provided in attachment 6.
(End of provision)
Rating Description Acceptable Quote meets all of the requirements identified.
Unacceptable Quote does not meet all of the requirements identified.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .