Attachment 3_PPQ_13Jan2026.docx
DOCX document 294 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W51EW726RA004
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) issued by the U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) Theater Support Center to evaluate offerors competing for RFP W51EW7-26-R-A004, the Base Test Support Services (BTSS) Follow-on contract for the U.S. Army Operational Evaluation Command. The questionnaire requests that references—identified as points of contact on previous or current government contracts—provide candid assessments of contractor performance on relevant federal, state, or local government contracts. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to Contracting Officer Ingrid V. Smith (ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil) and Contract Specialist Avangela Y. Ligons-Sutton (avangela.y.ligons-sutton.civ@army.mil) within five business days of receipt or by a specified deadline, whichever occurs first.
The questionnaire evaluates offeror performance across six core categories using a four-tier rating scale (High Confidence, Moderate Confidence, Low Confidence, No Confidence): compliance with specifications and workmanship standards; project management effectiveness including subcontractor control; timeliness of service and product delivery; cost forecasting and control; commitment to customer satisfaction; and comparison to BTSS scope requirements. Part F specifically assesses whether prior contracts included elements relevant to BTSS, such as Top Secret security clearance requirements, personnel support for management/IT/logistics functions, phase-in and transition capabilities within 30 days or less, field test services, government-furnished property and facilities management, and flexible personnel scaling for rapid expansion and contraction. Respondents must provide detailed rationales for all ratings and identify other relevant past performance sources.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BTSS DRFP Follow Up_Government Responses_posted 02Mar2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRFP W51EW726RA004_RFI Responses_Posted 13Feb2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TE H- Government Furnished Facilites_27Jan2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 5_Historical Data_Apr 2021-Mar 2025.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFI Template_DRFP W51EW726RA004.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TE D GFP_as of 27Jan2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TE G OTC BTSS Military Test Locations List.pdf | ||
| TE E _BTSS_DD254.pdf | ||
| DRAFT_RFP W51EW726RA004_posted 02Feb2026.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2_Sample Test_SOW-M10_BCV_IOT.pdf | ||
| TE C DD1423 A001 Block 16 Continuation Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4_Pricing Matrix_29Jan2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TE C DD1423_BTSS_27Jan2026.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5_Historical Data_Apr 2021-Mar 2025.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TE H- Government Furnished Facilites_27Jan2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TE F-IML Listing.XLSX | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6_WGDs_as of 03Dec2025.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1_BTSS PWS_30Jan2026.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of the Army U.S. Army mission and installation contracting command
THEATER SUPPORT CENTER
HQ MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND (MICC)
MMM DD, 2026
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W51EW7-26-R-A004
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC), Theater Support Center (TSC), is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government contracts as compared to solicitation W51EW7-26-R-A004. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
The prospective Offeror will complete Part I. I respectfully request you complete Part II with BOTH a rating and rationale for the rating.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the MICC-TSC Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist herein, no later than five (5) days after receipt of request or by 5:00 PM EDT on MMM DD, 2026, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to the undersigned, ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialist, avangela.y.ligons-sutton.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Any questions may be directed to the undersigned.
Sincerely, Ingrid V. Smith Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contract Specialist, Avangela Ligons-Sutton, via avangela.y.ligons-sutton.civ@army.mil. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
High Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Moderate Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Low Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror competing for the BTSS Follow-on)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Respondent Point of Contact) *Note: rationale is requested for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· High Confidence
· Moderate Confidence
· Low Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Low Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Low Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs
· Low Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Low Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. Comparison to BTSS scope. Please check if your contract included any (or all) of the following services and/or support:
| · Requirements for Top Secret security clearance |
| · Contractor provided personnel to support functions of management, information technology, environmental services, logistics that includes supply operations, vehicle maintenance, purchasing, facility, motor pool operations |
| · Contract Phase-in and transition requirements with an incumbent contractor, within 30-days or less |
| · Field test services required to support operational test events in data collection, data entry, test documentation |
| · Government Furnished Property (GFP) management |
| · Contractor provides test support services and support in many diverse environments and circumstances, ranging from government provided facilities, CONUS military installations, to field test sites at various CONUS and OCONUS locations and installations |
| · Government Furnished Facilities access and management |
| · Requires Contractor flexible capability to expand and contract rapidly to support test requirements that shall require an influx of personnel |
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
H. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
I. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Points of Contact identified in the cover letter, emails copied below for ease of reference.
ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil avangela.y.ligons-sutton.civ@army.mil
Thank you for your assistance.
image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .