Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

ATTACHMENT 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire

FA441826Q0010

5 March 2026

Memorandum for Prospective Evaluators

From: 628 Contracting Squadron 101 E. Hill Blvd Joint Base Charleston, SC 29404

1) The 628th Contracting Squadron, Joint Base Charleston, SC is in the process of selecting a contractor for a one-time service requirement for the temporary event rentals for the 2026 Joint Base Charleston Air Show. The contractor will be responsible for the complete delivery, setup, and teardown of tents, tables, and chairs on the installation.

2) One of the considerations in quote evaluation is verification of the Vendor’s past performance on contracts which reflect the Vendor’s ability to perform the proposed effort. We depend on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have first-hand experience with a vendor, for the evaluation of the Vendor’s performance on those contracts.

3) Our areas of interest in the vendor are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire by indicating your rating and providing comments wherever applicable. For any ratings above or below satisfactory, please explain how the contractor either exceeded or failed to meet your requirement and attach it to your response. This can be a copy of a performance evaluation, discrepancy report, or other documentation.

Once complete, please sign the document in the space provided.

4) Prospective vendors may be contacted regarding questions or concerns identified.

However, the individual’s name completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed.

5) Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated and is critical to our evaluation. Please return the completed questionnaire as soon as possible but NLT 4:00 PM EST on 5 March, 2025 to Leo Lachapelle at leo.lachapelle.2@us.af.mil and Matthew Michel at matthew.michel@us.af.mil.

6) If you have any questions, please email or call Contract Specialist, Leo Lachapelle at 843-963-3706. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

Leo Lachapelle Contract Specialist

ATTACHMENT 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The 628th Contracting Squadron at Joint Base Charleston is in the process of competitively selecting a contractor to provide event rental services for the 2026 Joint Base Charleston Air Show. The scope of this requirement includes the complete delivery, professional setup and timely teardown of tents, tables, and chairs. The vendor has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist with our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this selection.

Please return via email no later than 4 PM EST on 5 March 2026 to Leo Lachapelle;

leo.lachapelle.2@us.af.mil and Matthew Michel; matt.michel@us.af.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

POC Title:

Telephone:

Email:

VENDOR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period Description of Requirement

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA Demonstrated the ability to meet work requirements and quality standards for this contract

Completed orders for the requirement on time and within budget

Addressed any quality issues or deficiencies either during the contractor’s service or upon notification of deficiency

Was responsive in communications with Government during and after the contract action

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime Subcontractor

If other than “Satisfactory”, explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Performance Summary Yes No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provided an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default, convenience, or cause?

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: ________________________________ Date: __________________________

Print Name: _______________________________ Title: __________________________

Telephone: __________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this vendor.

E V S M U NA

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?