Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 136 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z02325R73110001
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 3) designed for collecting detailed performance evaluation information for a federal contract opportunity. The form is structured in two main sections: Section 1 to be completed by the offeror with basic contract details, and Section 2 to be completed by a reference contact who will assess the contractor's performance across four key categories: Quality of Product/Service, Schedule, Cost, and Management (Business Relations).
The questionnaire provides comprehensive rating definitions ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with specific guidance for evaluating each performance category. References are instructed to complete and return the form to Miranda Smith and Adam Petty at their U.S. Coast Guard email addresses by July 28, 2025, at 11:00 AM EST. The form allows for detailed comments and examples to support performance ratings, with special notes for Firm-Fixed Price contracts where certain ratings may be marked as "Not Rated".
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A00002 Attachment 2- Pricing Schedule Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A0001 70Z02325R73110001 Questions and Answers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A0001 Boat Maintenance RFQ 7-16-2025.pdf | ||
| A00001 MSRT Boat Maintenance Statement of Work .pdf | ||
| A00001 Attachment 2- Pricing Schedule Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1- Boat Maintenance Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Pricing Schedule Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Boat Maintenance RFQ 7-2-2025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3
Past Performance Questionnaire (Complete one form per reference)
Please fill out the applicable information.
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
Offeror:
Contract Number:
BPA Number:
Order Number:
__ Prime or _____ Subcontractor (Check one)
Dollar Amount:$0.00 Date Completed: MM/DD/YY
Contract Type:
(Check One) _____ Fixed Price _____ Cost Reimbursement _____ Other (Specify)
Item/Service Description:
Contract Quantity/Period of Performance:
Customer/Business/Agency Name:
Customer POC (Note: Ensure POC information is valid and current) Name:
Address:
Phone:
E-mail:
SECTION 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE
The offeror in Section 1 provided you as reference for a solicitation they are a party to. Please complete Section 2 and return to Miranda Smith at Miranda.V.Smith@uscg.mil and Adam Petty at Adam F. Petty1@uscg.mil no later than July 28, 2025, by 11:00 AM EST.
Evaluation In TABLE 3 indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area and overall rating by identifying with an “x” or check mark for the most appropriate rating according to the Performance Rating Definitions in Table 2. Provide rationale, including specific examples, as appropriate, to support your ratings in the space provided for comments for each category area.
If more space is needed, continue your comments in the “Additional Comments” section at the end of this questionnaire.
TABLE 2 - PERFORMANCE RATINGS DEFINITIONS
Rating Description
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
TABLE 1- Category Area
Rating Description
Quality of Product/Service
Assessment based on the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
Schedule Assessment based on the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
Cost Assessment based on the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost.
***If contract is/was Firm-Fixed Price or Firm-Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, please mark “Not Rated”***
Management (Business Relations)
Assessment based on the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts.
mailto:Miranda.V.Smith@uscg.mil
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Rated Not applicable or has no history.
TABLE 3 - PERFORMANCE RATINGS
Category Rating
1. Quality of Product/Service:
__Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
2. Schedule: __Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
3. Cost:
***If contract is/was Firm-Fixed Price or Firm-Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, please mark “Not Rated”***
__Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
4. Management (Business Relations): __Exceptional __Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
Additional Comments:
In TABLE 3 indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area and overall rating by identifying with an “x” or check mark for the most appropriate rating according to the Performance Rating Definitions in Table 2. Provide rationale, inc...
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .