Attachment_2_-_Quote_Submission_Package.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Chinn Ridge Land Clearing- Manassas Battlefield
- Solicitation number
- 140P3022Q0004
About this file
This document provides templates and instructions for submitting a quote proposal for a land clearing project at the Manassas National Battlefield. The solicitation requests quotes for clearing land at Chinn Ridge within the Manassas Battlefield, identified as solicitation number 140P3022Q0004 issued by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Offerors should complete the experience questionnaire detailing relevant past performance on similar land clearing projects, as well as the past performance questionnaire to be filled out by references. Upon selection, the contractor will clear the land at Chinn Ridge as directed by the National Park Service.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2
QUOTE SUBMISSION PACKAGE
INSTRUCTIONS: The following forms may be used to prepare proposals for the subject solicitation as applicable.
CONTENTS:
For Technical Volume:
1. Experience Questionnaire
2. Past Performance Questionnaire
For Business & Price Volume:
3. General Information
Experience Questionnaire READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to list projects performed that are similar to the work described in this solicitation. Use this form to address your familiarity with the project requirements and with the evaluation criteria described in the solicitation. Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their experience may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s experience.
Name of Contractor/Offeror:
| # |
| Project Name: |
Project Location:
Name of Owner:
Address of Owner:
Telephone Number:
Project Value:
Dates of Construction:
Description of the Project and Scope of Offeror’s Work
Performance Remarks
Description of the Project and Scope of Offeror’s Work (continuation)
Performance Remarks (continuation)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Information Provided in Response to Solicitation No.: 140P3022Q0004
2. Offeror:
PART I: Contract Information
3. Customer Organization:
4. Reference Name and Title: (individual completing this questionnaire)
5. Contract Number:
6. Contract Type:
7. Contract Value:
8. Description of Work/Services:
9. Problems: (if problems encountered on this contract, explain corrective action taken)
Part II: Performance Assessment (to be completed by reviewer)
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| E |
| EXCEPTIONAL - |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| V |
| VERY GOOD - |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S |
| SATISFACTORY - |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| M |
| MARGINAL - |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U |
| UNSATISFACTORY- |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N |
| NOT APPLICABLE - |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
1. Quality of product or service: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|
Comment:
2. Schedule: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|
Comment:
3. Management: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|
Comment:
4. Regulatory Compliance: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|
Comment:
NPS:
Contract Specialist: Andrew Griffith
EMAIL FORM TO: Andrew_griffith@nps.gov
GENERAL INFORMATION
DUNS #:
TIN #:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .