Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 174 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1330
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts for solicitation 1305M226Q0255. The document provides a standardized assessment instrument with four key evaluation categories, each with a five-point rating scale.
The questionnaire assesses contractors across Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, and Management dimensions. Each category uses identical rating levels: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory, with detailed definitions for each rating. Quality of Service evaluates performance against contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship. Schedule assesses timeliness of completion for contracts, task orders, milestones, and delivery schedules. Cost Control measures the contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling costs. Management evaluates the integration and coordination of contract activities, including problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, contractor behavior, and customer satisfaction. Each section includes space for rater comments. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to Contract Specialist Ravonda Smith (ravonda.smith@noaa.gov) and Contracting Officer Jackie Shewmaker (jackie.a.shewmaker@noaa.gov) no later than September 14, 2026 at 12:00 PM Eastern Time. The questionnaire requires identification of the reference contract number on which the past performance evaluation is based and must be signed by the rater with date.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M226Q0255 Attachment: 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________ (Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Ravonda Smith and Contracting Officer, Jackie Shewmaker, no later than September 14, 2026 12:00 PM Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________
Rater’s Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Ravonda Smith and Contracting Officer, Jackie Shewmaker, no later than September 14, 2026 12:00 PM Eastern Time:
ravonda.smith@noaa.gov jackie.a.shewmaker@noaa.gov mailto:ravonda.smith@noaa.gov mailto:jackie.a.shewmaker@noaa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .