Attachment 2 - Past Perfomance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Qualifications USDA ARS PWA Architect-Engineer IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12905B23R0005
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Field Research Implementation and Information Delivery Pacific West Area

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for an architect-engineer firm. The questionnaire requests ratings on factors such as design services, general architectural services, mechanical engineering services, and electrical engineering services. It is to be completed for a firm's past performance on Contract Number 12905B23R0005 and submitted to the USDA Agricultural Research Service Field Research Implementation and Information Delivery Pacific West Area by July 30, 2023. The related federal contract opportunity is a request for qualifications for an architect-engineer indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity multiple award contract to provide planning, design, and construction-related services to modernize and improve USDA research facilities in the Pacific West Area.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Request for Qualifications USDA ARS PWA Architect-Engineer IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions and Answers ver 3.pdf PDF
Request for Qualifications Ammended.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Past Perfomance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Questions and Answers ver 2.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - SF330.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Client Authorization Ltr.docx DOCX document
Attachment 8 - Lobbying Disclosure.pdf PDF
Request for Qualifications Final.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Questions and Answers.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - PWA Map.jpg JPG image
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

***Please DO NOT send the completed PPQ back to the Contractor. Please email directly to the following individuals no later than July 30, 2023.

Michael Sherlock Michael.Sherlock@usda.gov Telephone (510)559-6339

Section 1: Contract and Program Identification A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Program Title:

E. Brief Program Description: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ F. Period of Performance:

G. Contract Dollar Value H. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel I. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS) or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract or task order? ____ Yes ____ No

Section 2: Rater Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/email address:

D. Are you willing to be contacted for additional information? ____ Yes ____ No Section 3: Performance Information Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

CodePerformance Rating
EEXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions above.

Factors to be rated
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

Design Services

1. Overall skill level and technical competence of the firm’s personnel.

2. Firm’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously.

3. Firm’s responsiveness to design review questions.

4. Firm’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team (Management).

5. Overall accuracy, completeness and coordination of the final design documents (Quality).

6. Firm’s ability to provide detailed and accurate cost estimates (Cost Control).

7. Firm’s ability to meet contract schedule (Performance Schedule).

8. Responsiveness during follow-on construction services.

General Architectural Services

1. Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of General Architectural documentation.

2. Firm’s ability and understanding of the overall Architectural process.

Factors to be rated
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

Mechanical Engineering Services

1. Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of Mechanical Engineering documentation.

2. Firm’s ability and understanding of overall Mechanical Engineering process.

Electrical Engineering Services

1. Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of Electrical Engineering documentation.

2. Firm’s ability and understanding of the overall Electrical Engineering process.

Civil Engineering Services

1. Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of the Civil Engineering documentation.

2. Firm’s ability and understanding of the overall Civil Engineering process.

Structural Engineering Services

1. Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of the Structural Engineering documentation.

2. Firm’s ability and understanding of the overall Structural Engineering process.

Cost Estimator

1. Overall accuracy, completeness and timeliness of Cost Estimate documentation.

2. Firm’s ability and understanding of Cost for the overall project.

Factors to be rated
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

Other

1. Would you ever award another contract to the A&E Firm?

2. Is the contractor rated in CPARS?

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 12905B23R0005 Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire 1 | Page

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .