Attachment 2 HTRO Scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 161kV Transformer IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- FA9101-26-R-161KVTRANSFORMER
About this file
This is a scoring matrix template for offeror self-evaluation in response to a 161kV Transformer IDIQ solicitation for the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center. Offerors must complete a self-scoring assessment across five primary evaluation categories with a maximum total of 5,000 points.
The first three categories evaluate work samples in Repair (Category 3.2.2.1), Replace (Category 3.2.2.2), and Spare (Category 3.2.2.3) services, with seven, six, and three subcategories respectively, each worth up to 5 points based on experience level. These categories include specialized transformer work such as complete on-site refurbishment, winding repair, load tap changer rebuild, cooling system refurbishment, tank and structural repair, coating application, and lightning arrestor replacement for transformers rated ≥161kV and ≥30MVA. The combined self-score points across these three categories cannot exceed 20 points total. Category 3.2.2.4 (Project Management, Development, and Design) is scored based on total dollar value of 161kV transformer projects supporting DoD installations, with a maximum of 60 points. Category 3.2.2.5 (CPARS/CPARS Equivalent Data Submission) allows up to five project submissions that generate bonus points calculated as a percentage based on ratings in Quality Management, Cost Control, Small Business Subcontracting, Regulatory Compliance, and Schedule; if offerors submit at least one CPARS entry for each of the first three categories, bonus points are doubled. The matrix enforces constraints that teaming subcontractor work samples and CPARS submissions cannot exceed prime contractor submissions, and all entries must be documented in designated yellow cells with supporting work sample documentation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions
| Instructions |
| 1. Only input data into the yellow cells of the Self Score Sheet tab. |
| 2. Please insert Offeror's name on Row 4. |
| 3. Offeror shall fill in Column D "Offeror Self-Score Points: Work performed by Prime" and Column E "Offeror Self-Score Points: Work performed by Teaming Subcontractor" for the first 5 Categories, 3.2.2.1-3.2.2.3. |
| 4. Sum of Work Samples submitted for each Subcategory cannot break the max allowable points (Column F must be less than or equal to Column C for each subcategory). |
| 5. An Offeror may account for a sum of 20 points across the first three Categories: 3.2.2.1 Repair, 3.2.2.2 Replace, and 3.2.2.3 Spares. Please note that points are referencing the value placed by the Offeror in columns D&E, not the score calculated from those entries. |
| 6. The total number of Work Samples submitted on behalf of a Teaming Subcontractor must be less than or equal to the number of Work Samples submitted for work performed by the Prime (Cell E29 must be less than or equal to Cell D29). |
| 7. All Offerors are to fill in the Project Management, Development, and Design Category (3.2.2.4) based off the projects/work samples submitted for sections 3.2.2.1-3.2.2.3. |
| 8. All Offerors are encouraged to fill out the CPARS/CPARS Equivalent Data Submission Category (3.2.2.5), columns A-I, based off the projects/work samples submitted from Categories 3.2.2.1-3.2.2.3. |
| 9. Offerors are allotted a maximum of five CPARS/CPARS Equivalent submissions (3.2.2.5). It is up to the Offeror to determine best score feasible with the available five submissions. Note that the number of subcontractor CPAR submissions must be less than or equal to the number of CPARs submitted for the Prime. |
| 10. Points allotted from CPARS/CPARS Equivalent data are considered a bonus score; each entry will produce a calculated percentage bonus based off of the specific Subcategory it is associated with and the Offeror's ratings. |
| 7. All Offerors are to fill in the Project Management, Development, and Design Category (3.2.2.4) based off the projects/work samples submitted for sections 3.2.2.1-3.2.2.3. |
| 8. All Offerors are encouraged to fill out the CPARS/CPARS Equivalent Data Submission Category (3.2.2.4), columns A-I, based off the projects/work samples submitted from Categories 3.2.2.1-3.2.2.3. |
| 9. Offerors are allotted a maximum of five CPARS/CPARS Equivalent submissions (3.2.2.5). It is up to the Offeror to determine best score feasible with the available five submissions. Note that the number of subcontractor CPAR submissions must be less than or equal to the number of CPARs submitted for the Prime. |
| 10. Points allotted from CPARS/CPARS Equivalent data are considered a bonus score; each entry will produce a calculated percentage bonus based off of the specific Subcategory it is associated with and the Offeror's ratings. |
| 11. If an Offeror is able to submit at least one CPARS/CPARS Equivalent response for each of the first three Categories (3.2.2.1 Repair, 3.2.2.2 Replace, 3.2.2.3 Spare), then the Offeror will receive a double bonus, doubling the points received for all CPAR submissions. |
Self Scoring Matrix Transformers IDIQ
| Draft Attachment L-4 HTRO Scoring Matrix | |||||||||||
| OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE] | |||||||||||
| Section L Paragraph | Category | Maximum Self-Score Points | Offeror Self-Score Points: Work performed by Prime (1-5) | Offeror Self-Score Points: Work performed by Teaming Subcontractor (1-5) | Offeror Proposed Total Self-Score Points | Self-Score Point Multiplication Factor | Offeror's Initial Unweighted Score | Weight Factor | Single Project Weighted Score | Max Weighted Score | Offeror's Weighted Score before Bonus |
| Repair | |||||||||||
| 3.2.2.1 | Number of Work Samples that include all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, supervision, and quality control to repair, repair by replace, or installation of the following systems: | ||||||||||
| R1 | Complete On-Site Transformer Refurbishment (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 12 | 2400 | 12000 | 0 | ||
| R2 | Winding Repair & On-Site Rewind (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 12 | 2400 | 12000 | 0 | ||
| R3 | Load Tap Changer (LTC) Rebuild (includ. Replacement of contacts and timing measurements) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 4 | 800 | 4000 | 0 | ||
| R4 | Cooling System & Radiator Refurbishment (radiator cleaning, fan/pump evaluation, and flow indicator replacement) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 7 | 1400 | 7000 | 0 | ||
| R5 | Transformer Tank & Structural Steel Repair (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 4 | 800 | 4000 | 0 | ||
| R6 | Surface Preparation and Coating Application (surface preparation and application of a multi-coat paint system compliant with SSPC standards on a power transformer) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 4 | 800 | 4000 | 0 | ||
| R7 | Replacing Lightning Arrestors in Substations (design, fabrication, and installation of custom mounting brackets and new station class lightning arresters on a >=161kV, >=30MVA transformer) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 22 | 4400 | 22000 | 0 | ||
| Replace | |||||||||||
| 3.2.2.2 | Number of Work Samples that include all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, supervision, and quality control to repair, repair by replace, or installation of the following systems: | ||||||||||
| A1 | New High-Voltage (>=161kV) Bushing Replacement (full replacement of 161kV class (or higher) bushings) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 10000 | 0 | ||
| A2 | New Control Cabinet (Design, Fab, & Install) (end-to-end experience designing, fabricating, installing, and testing a new NEMA 3R transformer control cabinet) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 5 | 1000 | 5000 | 0 | ||
| A3 | New IED Programming & SCADA Integration (programming and integrating a new IED (e.g., SEL-2414) with a SCADA system using DNP3 protocol) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 5 | 1000 | 5000 | 0 | ||
| A4 | Installation of New Protective Devices (new pressure relief device and new station class lightning arresters on a >=161kV transformer) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 3 | 600 | 3000 | 0 | ||
| A5 | Advanced Electrical Testing & Diagnostics (performed and provided final reports for a suite of advanced diagnostics (must include SFRA, Insulation Power Factor, and DGA sampling/analysis)) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 10000 | 0 | ||
| A6 | Final Documentation & Reporting (complete final documentation package, including as-built drawings, NETA-compliant test reports, and component O&M manuals) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 3 | 600 | 3000 | 0 | ||
| Spare | |||||||||||
| 3.2.2.3 | Number of Work Samples that include all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, supervision, and quality control to repair, repair by replace, or installation of the following systems: | 5 | 5000 | ||||||||
| S1 | New Transformer Manufacturing/Procurement (new >=30 MVA, >=161kV transformer the offeror has manufactured or served as prime contractor for the procurement of) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 20 | 4000 | 20000 | 0 | ||
| S2 | Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Management (developed and managed a complete Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) plan per IEEE C57.12.90)) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 5 | 1000 | 5000 | 0 | ||
| S3 | New Transformer Design & Submittal (creating and getting approval for a complete new transformer design submittal package, including outline drawings, schematics, and calculations) (>=161kV, >=30MVA) | 5 | 0 | 200.00 | 0 | 4 | 800 | 4000 | 0 |
| Total Sum of Self-Score Points Selected for Repair, Replace, and Spare cannot be greater than 20. | ||||
| Total Sum of Teaming Subcontractor Points (Cell E29) cannot be greater than Total Sum of the Prime's Points (Cell D29). | Total Self-Score Points | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project Management, Development, and Design | Acceptable Input (1-60) | |||||||||
| 3.2.2.4 | Total dollar value of 161kV transformer projects supporting DoD Installations. | 60 | 0 | 16.67 | 0 | 3 | 50 | 3000 | 0 |
Offeror is only to input data into the blue cells.
| Offeror's Weighted Score Before CPARS Bonus (Column L Sum) | 0 |
| Offeror's Bonus Score based off CPARS Data (CPARS Sections Below) | 0 |
| Offeror's Final Self Score | 0 |
| Government-Validated Score |
| 3.2.2.5 | CPARS/CPARS Equivalent Data Submission | ||||||||
| Project 1 | Contract Title | Subsection Associated with Project | Quality | Management | Cost Control | Small Business Subcontracting | Regulatory Compliance | Schedule | Total Score from Provided Ratings |
| Year | WS Number/Project Title | Select from Dropdown | |||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0 | Average | 0.00 | |||||||
| Project Details from Above Subsections | Unweighted Score | Weighted Score | Bonus Awarded | 0% | 0 |
| Project 2 | Contract Title | Subsection Associated with Project | Quality | Management | Cost Control | Small Business Subcontracting | Regulatory Compliance | Schedule | Total Score from Provided Ratings |
| Year | WS Number/Project Title | Select from Dropdown | |||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0 | Average | 0.00 | |||||||
| Project Details from Above Subsections | Unweighted Score | Weighted Score | Bonus Awarded | 0% | 0 |
| Project 3 | Contract Title | Subsection Associated with Project | Quality | Management | Cost Control | Small Business Subcontracting | Regulatory Compliance | Schedule | Total Score from Provided Ratings |
| Year | WS Number/Project Title | Select from Dropdown | |||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0 | Average | 0.00 | |||||||
| Project Details from Above Subsections | Unweighted Score | Weighted Score | Bonus Awarded | 0% | 0 |
| Project 4 | Contract Title | Subsection Associated with Project | Quality | Management | Cost Control | Small Business Subcontracting | Regulatory Compliance | Schedule | Total Score from Provided Ratings |
| Year | WS Number/Project Title | Select from Dropdown | |||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0 | Average | 0.00 | |||||||
| Project Details from Above Subsections | Unweighted Score | Weighted Score | Bonus Awarded | 0% | 0 |
| Project 5 | Contract Title | Subsection Associated with Project | Quality | Management | Cost Control | Small Business Subcontracting | Regulatory Compliance | Schedule | Total Score from Provided Ratings |
| Year | WS Number/Project Title | Select from Dropdown | |||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0.00 | |||||||||
| 0 | Average | 0.00 | |||||||
| Project Details from Above Subsections | Unweighted Score | Weighted Score | Bonus Awarded | 0% | 0 |
| Exceptional | 50 |
| Very Good | 40 |
| Satisfactory | 20 |
| Marginal | 0 |
| Unsatisfactory | -5 |
| N/A | 0 |
| "" | 0 |
| R1 |
| R2 |
| R3 |
| R4 |
| R5 |
| R6 |
| R7 |
| A1 |
| A2 |
| A3 |
| A4 |
| A5 |
| A6 |
| S1 |
| S2 |
| S3 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .