Attachment 17 Experience Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 121 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICE POTABLE AND FIRE WATER GRID AT DARBY MILITARY COMMUNITY (DMC)
- Solicitation number
- W912PF25QA087
About this file
This document is a Request for Quote (RFQ) #W912PF25QATBD, specifically Attachment #11, which is an Experience Questionnaire for a contract related to HVAC maintenance and repair services. The form requires potential contractors to provide detailed information about their previous experience in providing "Maintenance and Repair Service of HVAC (Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning) & Heating Systems at DMC", with a 500-word narrative limit.
The questionnaire captures comprehensive details about prior contract performance, including whether the work was performed as a prime or subcontractor, contract number, location of performance, contract dates, contract price, and commissioning firm information. Additionally, the form includes a section for identifying potential negative performance or integrity issues, requiring contractors to disclose and explain any problems encountered during previous contract executions. The document appears to be part of a federal contracting process, with references to FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) 9.104 for determining contractor responsibility.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR QUOTE # W912PF25QATBD
ATTACHMENT#11 EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Performed as Prime or Subcontractor
Contract Number
Location of performance
Contract start and end date
Contract price
Commissioning firm
(1) Name
(2) Address
Narrative about experience of providing “Maintenance and Repair Service of HVAC (Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning) & Heating Systems at DMC” required in the Solicitatin (Limit 500 Words)
Technical Point of Contact of Commissioning Firm
Name
Title
Telephone
Cellular
In determining responsibility IAW FAR 9.104, will the Government discover any negative performance and/or integrity issues?
If so, indicate the corrective actions taken to resolve the problems encountered during the execution of the work.
Yes, when a contract is transferred from the PD2 (Procurement Desktop Defense) system to the ACWS (Automated Contract Workflow System), the contract in PD2 is typically marked as "T" to indicate its transfer. This "T" status signifies that the contract is no longer actively managed within the PD2 system and has been moved to ACWS for its ongoing management and lifecycle.
No, a contract marked as "T" (transferred to ACWS) in PD2 is generally not modifiable within PD2. Once a contract is transferred to ACWS (presumably a separate system or process), any further modifications would need to be handled within that new system, not
PD2.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .